Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32181683›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology2020

Tumor Copy Number Deconvolution Integrating Bulk and Single-Cell Sequencing Data.

Haoyun Lei, Bochuan Lyu, E Michael Gertz, Alejandro A Schäffer, Xulian Shi, Kui Wu, Guibo Li, Liqin Xu, Yong Hou, Michael Dean and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Sc-TUSV-Ext: Single-Cell Clonal Lineage Inference from Single Nucleotide Variants, Copy Number Alterations, and Structural Variants.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Joint Clustering of Single-Cell Sequencing and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Data for Reconstructing Clonal Heterogeneity in Cancers.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Haoyun LeiComputational Biology Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Bochuan LyuDepartment of Mathematics, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, Terre Haute, Indiana.
E Michael GertzNational Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Alejandro A SchäfferNational Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Xulian ShiBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Kui WuBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Guibo LiBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Liqin XuBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Yong HouBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Michael DeanLaboratory of Translational Genomics, Division of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, National Cancer Institute, U.S. National Institutes of Health, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Russell SchwartzComputational Biology Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Funding

DECONVOLUTION OF CLONAL HETEROGENEITY FROM BULK AND SINGLE-CELL VARIATION DATAR21CA216452 · NCI · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI SCHWARTZ, RUSSELL S · 2017 to 2018
$342k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA216452
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Characterizing intratumor heterogeneity (ITH) is crucial to understanding cancer development, but it is hampered by limits of available data sources. Bulk DNA sequencing is the most common technology to assess ITH, but involves the analysis of a mixture of many genetically distinct cells in each sample, which must then be computationally deconvolved. Single-cell sequencing is a promising alternative, but its limitations-for example, high noise, difficulty scaling to large populations, technical artifacts, and large data sets-have so far made it impractical for studying cohorts of sufficient size to identify statistically robust features of tumor evolution. We have developed strategies for deconvolution and tumor phylogenetics combining limited amounts of bulk and single-cell data to gain some advantages of single-cell resolution with much lower cost, with specific focus on deconvolving genomic copy number data. We developed a mixed membership model for clonal deconvolution via non-negative matrix factorization balancing deconvolution quality with similarity to single-cell samples via an associated efficient coordinate descent algorithm. We then improve on that algorithm by integrating deconvolution with clonal phylogeny inference, using a mixed integer linear programming model to incorporate a minimum evolution phylogenetic tree cost in the problem objective. We demonstrate the effectiveness of these methods on semisimulated data of known ground truth, showing improved deconvolution accuracy relative to bulk data alone.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputational BiologyDNA Copy Number VariationsGenome, HumanHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansNeoplasmsPhylogenySingle-Cell Analysiscancercopy number alteration (CNA)genomic deconvolutionheterogeneitynon-negative matrix factorization (NMF)

Identifiers

PMID32181683
PMCPMC7185355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.