Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32181418›Full record

ArticleNetwork neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2020

Identifying brain network topology changes in task processes and psychiatric disorders.

Paria Rezaeinia, Kim Fairley, Piya Pal, François G Meyer, R McKell Carter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paria RezaeiniaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Kim FairleyDepartment of Economics, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Piya PalDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
François G MeyerDepartment of Applied Mathematics, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA.
R McKell CarterInstitute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2235-6529

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A central goal in neuroscience is to understand how dynamic networks of neural activity produce effective representations of the world. Advances in the theory of graph measures raise the possibility of elucidating network topologies central to the construction of these representations. We leverage a result from the description of lollipop graphs to identify an iconic network topology in functional magnetic resonance imaging data and characterize changes to those networks during task performance and in populations diagnosed with psychiatric disorders. During task performance, we find that task-relevant subnetworks change topology, becoming more integrated by increasing connectivity throughout cortex. Analysis of resting state connectivity in clinical populations shows a similar pattern of subnetwork topology changes; resting scans becoming less default-like with more integrated sensory paths. The study of brain network topologies and their relationship to cognitive models of information processing raises new opportunities for understanding brain function and its disorders.

Indexed as

fMRIFunctional ConnectivityHitting timeRandom walk

Identifiers

PMID32181418
PMCPMC7069064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.