Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32181407›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2020

Open Access publishing practice in geochemistry: overview of current state and look to the future.

Olivier Pourret, Andrew Hursthouse, Dasapta Erwin Irawan, Karen Johannesson, Haiyan Liu, Marc Poujol, Romain Tartèse, Eric D van Hullebusch, Oliver Wiche

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Olivier PourretUniLaSalle, AGHYLE, Beauvais, France.
Andrew HursthouseSchool of Computing, Engineering & Physical Sciences, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley, PA1 2BE, UK.
Dasapta Erwin IrawanFaculty of Earth Sciences and Technology, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia.
Karen JohannessonSchool of the Environment, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, USA.
Haiyan LiuSchool of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering, East China University of Technology, Nanchang, 330013, PR China.
Marc PoujolUniv Rennes, CNRS, Géosciences Rennes - UMR 6118, F-35000 Rennes, France.
Romain TartèseDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Eric D van HullebuschUniversité de Paris, Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, CNRS, Paris, France.
Oliver WicheInstitute for Biosciences, Biology/Ecology Unit, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Freiberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Open Access (OA) describes the free, unrestricted access to and re-use of research articles. Recently, a new wave of interest, debate, and practice surrounding OA publishing has emerged. In this paper, we provide a simple overview of the trends in OA practice in the broad field of geochemistry. Characteristics of the approach such as whether or not an article processing charge (APC) exists, what embargo periods or restrictions on self-archiving' policies are in place, and whether or not the sharing of preprints is permitted are described. The majority of journals have self-archiving policies that allow authors to share their peer reviewed work via green OA without charge. There is no clear relationship between journal impact and APC. The journals with the highest APC are typically those of the major commercial publishers, rather than the geochemistry community themselves. The rise in OA publishing has potential impacts on the profiles of researchers and tends to devolve costs from organizations to individuals. Until the geochemistry community makes the decision to move away from journal-based evaluation criteria, it is likely that such high costs will continue to impose financial inequities upon research community. However, geochemists could more widely choose legal self-archiving as an equitable and sustainable way to disseminate their research.

Indexed as

Article processing chargeBiogeochemistryBiogeoscienceCatchment geochemistryEarth sciencesEnvironmental geochemistryFossil geochemistryGeochemistryGreen routeHydrochemistryInformation scienceIsotope geochemistryOpen accessPetroleum geochemistryRepositoryTrace element geochemistry

Identifiers

PMID32181407
PMCPMC7063138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.