Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32181332›Full record

ArticleScience advances2020

Aspiration-assisted bioprinting for precise positioning of biologics.

Bugra Ayan, Dong Nyoung Heo, Zhifeng Zhang, Madhuri Dey, Adomas Povilianskas, Corina Drapaca, Ibrahim T Ozbolat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 151 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
151citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

151 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Bioprinting of miRNA-Induced Spheroids for Vascularized, Heterocellular Bone Regeneration.Chemical engineering journal (Lausanne, Switzerland : 1996) · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Advances in vascularized organoids.Chinese medical journal · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

91 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bugra AyanEngineering Science and Mechanics Department, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4614-263X
Dong Nyoung HeoEngineering Science and Mechanics Department, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7717-7184
Zhifeng ZhangEngineering Science and Mechanics Department, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1577-3316
Madhuri DeyThe Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9523-8083
Adomas PovilianskasEngineering Science and Mechanics Department, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0012-3006
Corina DrapacaEngineering Science and Mechanics Department, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6128-8285
Ibrahim T OzbolatEngineering Science and Mechanics Department, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8328-4528

Funding

Immune-Cancer Cell Interactions in a 3D Bioprinted Tumor MicroenvironmentR21CA224422 · NCI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI UNUTMAZ, DERYA · 2018 to 2019
$428k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA224422
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting is an appealing approach for building tissues; however, bioprinting of mini-tissue blocks (i.e., spheroids) with precise control on their positioning in 3D space has been a major obstacle. Here, we unveil "aspiration-assisted bioprinting (AAB)," which enables picking and bioprinting biologics in 3D through harnessing the power of aspiration forces, and when coupled with microvalve bioprinting, it facilitated different biofabrication schemes including scaffold-based or scaffold-free bioprinting at an unprecedented placement precision, ~11% with respect to the spheroid size. We studied the underlying physical mechanism of AAB to understand interactions between aspirated viscoelastic spheroids and physical governing forces during aspiration and bioprinting. We bioprinted a wide range of biologics with dimensions in an order-of-magnitude range including tissue spheroids (80 to 600 μm), tissue strands (~800 μm), or single cells (electrocytes, ~400 μm), and as applications, we illustrated the patterning of angiogenic sprouting spheroids and self-assembly of osteogenic spheroids.

Indexed as

BioprintingNeovascularization, PhysiologicPrinting, Three-DimensionalTissue Engineering3T3 CellsAnimalsBiological ProductsCell Line, TumorMiceSpheroids, CellularBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID32181332
PMCPMC7060055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.