ArticleAsian journal of neurosurgery
Evaluation of the Evan's and Bicaudate Index for Rural Population in Central India using Computed Tomography.
Article in Asian journal of neurosurgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Age- and sex-specific reference values of Evans' Index and cranial dimensions on brain CT in a south-eastern Nigerian hospital population.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Normative Evans index values in the Turkish adult population: an age- and sex-stratified MRI study.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2026Article
- Geometric properties of caudate and putamen mark the progression of Huntington's disease.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
- Morphometric analysis of ventricular indexes and intracranial cerebrospinal fluid spaces in the brain using magnetic resonance imaging healthy in Van cats.BMC veterinary research · 2025Article
- Predictive factors for shunt dependency in patients with spontaneous intraventricular hemorrhage.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Normative parameters of the Evans Index using Computer Tomography in the Saudi population.Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEvans index (EI) and Bicaudate index (BCI) are practical markers of ventricular volume and are helpful radiological markers in the diagnosis of normal pressure hydrocephalus. Worldwide, variation exists in normative studies for both these indices. Most of the studies conducted for EI and BCI are based on the Western population data. No study has been performed on the rural population of Central India. The purpose of this study is to develop normative data on EI and BCI that can be extrapolated for future reference. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis was a retrospective study conducted from December 2018 to May 2019 in MGIMS Hospital, Sevagram, Maharashtra, India, which is a rural hospital in Central India. All patients with either a head injury or neurological complaints although with normal computed tomography (CT) brain were included in the study. Patients with diagnosed neurological disorder, clinical features suggesting hydrocephalus, or intracranial pathology on CT brain were excluded from the study. Five hundred and eleven patients were selected for this study, and EI and BCI was calculated for them.
resultsThe mean value of EI and BCI in our study was 0.2707 and 0.1121, respectively. Both indices showed a statistically significant difference between males and females. The value of both indices increased with age.
conclusionAlthough our study is in agreement with the cutoff value of EI to diagnose dilated lateral ventricles as 0.3 for age <70 years, cutoff value of EI for the older population should be reconsidered to 0.34.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.