Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32181165›Full record

ReviewAsian journal of neurosurgery

Comparative Outcome Analysis of Enterprise and Neuroform Stent-Assisted Coiling of Cerebral Aneurysms: A Review of the Literature.

Ram Kumar Goyal, Yoko Kato, Tsukasa Kawase, Kentaro Suzuki, Yashuhiro Yamada, Saurabh Sharma, Sneha Chitra Balasubramanian, Riki Tanaka, Kyosuke Miyatani, Kojima Daijiro

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Asian journal of neurosurgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Enterprise stent…still useful after all these years.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Early clinical experience with the ACCEROInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ram Kumar GoyalDepartment of Neurosurgery, GNRC Hospital, Guwahati, Assam, India.
Yoko KatoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Bantane Hospital, Fujita Health University, Nagoya, Japan.
Tsukasa KawaseDepartment of Neurosurgery, Bantane Hospital, Fujita Health University, Nagoya, Japan.
Kentaro SuzukiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Bantane Hospital, Fujita Health University, Nagoya, Japan.
Yashuhiro YamadaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Bantane Hospital, Fujita Health University, Nagoya, Japan.
Saurabh SharmaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Max Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Sneha Chitra BalasubramanianDepartment of Neurosurgery, Bantane Hospital, Fujita Health University, Nagoya, Japan.
Riki TanakaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Bantane Hospital, Fujita Health University, Nagoya, Japan.
Kyosuke MiyataniDepartment of Neurosurgery, Bantane Hospital, Fujita Health University, Nagoya, Japan.
Kojima DaijiroDepartment of Neurosurgery, Bantane Hospital, Fujita Health University, Nagoya, Japan.
Fujita Health University Hospital · JPGovernment Ayurvedic College and Hospital · INMax Healthcare · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOne of the popular treatment strategies for complex cerebral aneurysms with wide necks or low dome-to-neck ratios is stent-assisted coiling. The most widely used intracranial stents for stent-assisted coiling are Neuroform (NF) and Enterprise (EP) stents. The purposes of this study are to review the recent literature of the past 5 years to compare outcomes between the EP and NF stent-assist coiling systems so as to comment on the safety, efficacy, complications, and recurrence rate of stent-assisted coiling in general.

methodsPubMed was used to search for all published literature of NF or EP stent-assisted coiling of unruptured cerebral aneurysms from January 2014 to August 2019 with the search terms of "Enterprise stent-assisted coiling," "Neuroform stent," and "Neuroform vs. Enterprise stent."

resultsTwenty two publications met the inclusion criteria which encompass 1764 patients and 1873 aneurysms. Out of these 1873 aneurysms, 1007 aneurysms were treated with EP stent and 866 aneurysms were treated with NF stent. The overall outcome was low rates of thromboembolic complications (4.37%) and intracranial hemorrhage (1.13%), low permanent morbidity (1.70%) and mortality (0.40%), and lower rate of recanalization (11%). Data analysis shows an overall higher rate of complication and recurrence of aneurysm and lower overall rate of aneurysmal occlusion in the patients where EP stent was used in comparison to NF stent. However, this difference was not statistically significant.

conclusionsThe review of two stent-assisted coiling devices using EP and NF stents including 1873 aneurysms in 1764 patients revealed that overall, it is safe and effective with comparable outcomes.

Indexed as

Aneurysmcerebral aneurysmEnterpriseintracranial aneurysmintracranial stentsNeuroformstent-assisted coiling

Identifiers

PMID32181165
PMCPMC7057877
OpenAlexW3007838362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.