Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32181084›Full record

ArticleCureus2020

Prospective Randomized Study Comparing the External Fixator and Volar Locking Plate in Intraarticular Distal Radius Fractures: Which Is Better?

Aryan Sharma, Subodh Pathak, Harinder Sandhu, Priyank Bagtharia, Naveen Kumar, Rajdeep S Bajwa, Vineet Pruthi, Jasneet S Chawla

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Volar-locking plate versus external fixator in the management of distal radius fractures: An isokinetic study.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aryan SharmaOrthopedics, Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Medical Sciences and Research. Maharishi Markandeshwar (deemed to be University), Ambala, IND.
Subodh PathakOrthopedics, Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Medical Sciences and Research. Maharishi Markandeshwar (deemed to be University), Ambala, IND.
Harinder SandhuOrthopedics, Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Medical Sciences and Research. Maharishi Markandeshwar (deemed to be University), Ambala, IND.
Priyank BagthariaOrthopedics, Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Medical Sciences and Research. Maharishi Markandeshwar (deemed to be University), Ambala, IND.
Naveen KumarOrthopedics, Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Medical Sciences and Research. Maharishi Markandeshwar (deemed to be University), Ambala, IND.
Rajdeep S BajwaOrthopedics, Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Medical Sciences and Research. Maharishi Markandeshwar (deemed to be University), Ambala, IND.
Vineet PruthiOrthopedics, Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Medical Sciences and Research. Maharishi Markandeshwar (deemed to be University), Ambala, IND.
Jasneet S ChawlaOrthopedics, Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Medical Sciences and Research. Maharishi Markandeshwar (deemed to be University), Ambala, IND.
Maharishi Markandeshwar University, Mullana · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Various treatment options for patients with an intraarticular distal radius fracture are available, but in cases of comminuted fractures, these narrow down to either a volar locking plate, an external fixator, or a combination of these two. We conducted this prospective study to compare the external fixation and internal fixation of intraarticular fractures of the distal radius in terms of clinical/functional outcome and complications and with the available literature. Material and method This prospective randomized study consisted of a total number of 30 patients with intraarticular fractures of the distal end of the radius divided randomly into two groups (A and B), treated by external fixation (Group A) and volar plating (Group B), in a tertiary care institute during the study period. Result The most patients were males >50 years of age, with injury to the right dominant hand most commonly caused by a fall on an outstretched hand. As per the modified Green & O'Brien scoring system, the volar plating group showed the final result as excellent in two (13.33%), good in seven (46.6%), fair in four (26.6%), and poor in two (13.3%) whereas an excellent outcome was seen in one (6.66%), good and fair in five patients each (33.3%), and poor in four (26.66%) patients at the six months follow-up. Conclusion Overall, both fixation techniques seem to apply sufficient stabilization to restore function and retain anatomy; however, volar locking plates have certain advantages over external fixator in the early postop period in terms of earlier recovery and mobilization.

Indexed as

external fixatorintraarticular fracture distal radiusmodified green & o’brien scorevolar plating

Identifiers

PMID32181084
PMCPMC7053667
OpenAlexW3003540490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.