ArticleCureus2020
Medical and Legal Implications of MRI Scout Imaging in a Surgical Patient with Case Presentation.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical relevance and governance of scout imaging data: a national survey of UK cross-sectional imaging radiographers.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Voxel-Based Morphometry of Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Using a 3D Fast Low-angle Shot Localizer Image: A Comparison with Magnetization-Prepared Rapid Gradient Echo.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025Article
- Voxel-based Morphometry of Alzheimer's Disease Using a Localizer Image: A Comparative Study with Magnetization Prepared Rapid Acquisition with Gradient Echo.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025Article
- Demographic and clinical data of patients with spinal epidural angiolipomas.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Deep Learning for Chest X-ray Diagnosis: Competition Between Radiologists with or Without Artificial Intelligence Assistance.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal epidural angiolipoma is an uncommon finding; this case is presented to display the medical and legal implications of MRI scout imaging. In this case, a preceding period of ambiguous and non-focal symptoms led to an MRI of the lumbar spine without contrast with a scout image that captured a thoracic lesion. Review of the scout film led to a subsequent MRI of the thoracic spine with and without contrast that aided clinical decision making leading to surgical resection of the identified lesion and resolution of symptoms for this patient. The use of scout imaging has been described in the literature, but no concise agreement among physicians or professional medical societies exists regarding what utility, if any, may be obtained from the review of scout imaging. A discussion of medical legal implications of MRI scout imaging follows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.