Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32180710›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in human neuroscience2020

Hyperscanning: A Valid Method to Study Neural Inter-brain Underpinnings of Social Interaction.

Artur Czeszumski, Sara Eustergerling, Anne Lang, David Menrath, Michael Gerstenberger, Susanne Schuberth, Felix Schreiber, Zadkiel Zuluaga Rendon, Peter König

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06978803 (HYEEG Discourse in Psychosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 203 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
203citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06978803 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

HYEEG Discourse in Psychosis: A Neurobehavioural Study

TypeobservationalSponsorDouglas Mental Health University InstituteRan2024 to 2026Enrolled110ConditionsPsychosis, Schizophrenia Disorders
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

203 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Parent-Child Neural Similarity and Synchrony: Toward an Integrative Framework.The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

143 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Artur CzeszumskiInstitute of Cognitive Science, Universität Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.
Sara EustergerlingInstitute of Cognitive Science, Universität Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.
Anne LangInstitute of Cognitive Science, Universität Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.
David MenrathInstitute of Cognitive Science, Universität Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.
Michael GerstenbergerInstitute of Cognitive Science, Universität Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.
Susanne SchuberthInstitute of Cognitive Science, Universität Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.
Felix SchreiberInstitute of Cognitive Science, Universität Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.
Zadkiel Zuluaga RendonInstitute of Cognitive Science, Universität Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.
Peter KönigInstitute of Cognitive Science, Universität Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social interactions are a crucial part of human life. Understanding the neural underpinnings of social interactions is a challenging task that the hyperscanning method has been trying to tackle over the last two decades. Here, we review the existing literature and evaluate the current state of the hyperscanning method. We review the type of methods (fMRI, M/EEG, and fNIRS) that are used to measure brain activity from more than one participant simultaneously and weigh their pros and cons for hyperscanning. Further, we discuss different types of analyses that are used to estimate brain networks and synchronization. Lastly, we present results of hyperscanning studies in the context of different cognitive functions and their relations to social interactions. All in all, we aim to comprehensively present methods, analyses, and results from the last 20 years of hyperscanning research.

Indexed as

EEGfMRIfNIRShyperscanningjoint actionMEGsocial cognitionsocial interactions

Identifiers

PMID32180710
PMCPMC7059252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.