Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32180700›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2020

Effects of Noise on the Behavioral and Neural Categorization of Speech.

Gavin M Bidelman, Lauren C Bush, Alex M Boudreaux

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Hearing in categories aids speech streaming at the "cocktail party".bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Sparsely Distributed, Pre-synaptic Kv3 KFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gavin M BidelmanInstitute for Intelligent Systems, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, United States.
Lauren C BushSchool of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, United States.
Alex M BoudreauxSchool of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, United States.

Funding

Neuroimaging biomarkers of speech processing deficits in MCIR01DC016267 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS · PI BIDELMAN, GAVIN M. · 2018 to 2022
$2.1M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated whether the categorical perception (CP) of speech might also provide a mechanism that aids its perception in noise. We varied signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) [clear, 0 dB, -5 dB] while listeners classified an acoustic-phonetic continuum (/u/ to /a/). Noise-related changes in behavioral categorization were only observed at the lowest SNR. Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) differentiated category vs. category-ambiguous speech by the P2 wave (~180-320 ms). Paralleling behavior, neural responses to speech with clear phonetic status (i.e., continuum endpoints) were robust to noise down to -5 dB SNR, whereas responses to ambiguous tokens declined with decreasing SNR. Results demonstrate that phonetic speech representations are more resistant to degradation than corresponding acoustic representations. Findings suggest the mere process of binning speech sounds into categories provides a robust mechanism to aid figure-ground speech perception by fortifying abstract categories from the acoustic signal and making the speech code more resistant to external interferences.

Indexed as

auditory event-related potentials (ERPs)categorical perceptioncocktail party effectEEGspeech-in-noise (SIN) perception

Identifiers

PMID32180700
PMCPMC7057933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.