ArticleBioinformatics and biology insights2020
The Nature and Arrangement of Pentatricopeptide Domains and the Linker Sequences Between Them.
Article in Bioinformatics and biology insights, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Generalized AI View of Tricopeptide Repeats: What's in a Name.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- An Analytical Review of the Structural Features of Pentatricopeptide Repeats: Strategic Amino Acids, Repeat Arrangements and Superhelical Architecture.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Evolution of Protein Structure and Stability in Global Warming.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- The Uniqueness of Tryptophan in Biology: Properties, Metabolism, Interactions and Localization in Proteins.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The tricopeptide (amino acid number in the 30s) repeats constitute some of the most common amino acid repeats in proteins of diverse organisms. The most important representatives of this class are the 34-residue and 35-residue repeats, eponymously known as tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) and pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR), respectively. The unit motif of both consists of a pair of alpha helices. As members of the large, all-helical repeat classes, TPR and PPR share structural similarities, but also play specific roles in protein function. In this study, a comprehensive bioinformatic analysis of the PPR units and the linkers that connect them was conducted. The results suggested the existence of PPR repeats of various formats, as well as smaller, PPR-unrelated repeats. Besides their length, these repeats differed in amino acid arrangements and location of key amino acids. These findings provide a broader and unified perspective of the pentatricopeptide family while raising provocative questions about the assembly and evolution of these domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.