ArticleMolecular vision2020
A standardized method to assess the endogenous activity and the light-response of the retinal clock in mammals.
Article in Molecular vision, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Divergent molecular and circuit mechanisms underlie light entrainment of retinal and suprachiasmatic nucleus circadian clocks.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026Article
- Circadian Rhythms in Murine Ocular Tissues Including Sclera Are Affected by Neurobasal A Medium Preincubation and Mouse Strain, but Not Sex.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Dopamine modulates the retinal clock through melanopsin-dependent regulation of cholinergic waves during development.BMC biology · 2023Article
- Multi-Stream Perfusion Bioreactor Integrated with Outlet Fractionation for Dynamic Cell Culture.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2022Article
- Ocular and extraocular roles of neuropsin in vertebrates.Trends in neurosciences · 2022Review
- Methods for Detecting PER2:LUCIFERASE Bioluminescence Rhythms in Freely Moving Mice.Journal of biological rhythms · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The bioluminescence reporter PER2::Luciferase (PER2::Luc) provides a powerful tool to study the regulation of biological clocks in explant tissues, including the retinal clock. However, the establishment of a standardized procedure to replicate experimental conditions and to enable meaningful comparisons between findings from different studies is still lacking. In addition, different parameters may affect the retinal circadian bioluminescence signal and its dynamic in in vitro assays. In the present study, we first evaluated the effect of sex and age on the main parameters of the mouse retinal clock. We then examined the impact of medium change on PER2::Luc rhythm and compared two light stimulation protocols of the retinal clock. Methods: In a first set of experiments, retinal explants from both male and female Results: We do not observe any sex-dependent effects on the amplitude, period, phase, and rhythmic power of the in vitro retinal PER2::Luc oscillations in animals aged of 2 to 3 months. The most remarkable effect of age is on the amplitude of PER2::Luc oscillations that significantly decrease from 1 to 4-5 months, whereas the endogenous period and rhythmic power increase slightly until 2 to 3 months and then do not change until 8 months. The phase is not affected by age. We then show that a medium change occurring after 4 days of culture does not alter the phase of PER2::Luc rhythm by comparison with day 0, whereas a medium change done after 6, 8, 9, or 10 days in culture advances the phase and lengthens the period. Finally, we observe that the physical displacement of the culture dishes containing retinal explants, even in complete darkness, induces a strong phase shift of PER2::Luc oscillations. Conclusions: Our work shows that the retina cultures are particularly sensitive to some aspects of the culture procedure, and it provides an accurate standard protocol to avoid biases due to artifactually induced phase shifts resulting from the medium change or physical displacement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32180677PMC7058435W3011797577What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.