Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32180263›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2020

Influence of labeling parameters and respiratory motion on velocity-selective arterial spin labeling for renal perfusion imaging.

Isabell K Bones, Suzanne L Franklin, Anita A Harteveld, Matthias J P van Osch, Jeroen Hendrikse, Chrit Moonen, Marijn van Stralen, Clemens Bos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Isabell K BonesCenter for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7916-5013
Suzanne L FranklinCenter for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6886-5578
Anita A HarteveldCenter for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3379-0710
Matthias J P van OschC.J. Gorter Center for High Field MRI, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7034-8959
Jeroen HendrikseDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6384-6140
Chrit MoonenCenter for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5593-3121
Marijn van StralenCenter for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3051-5000
Clemens BosCenter for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9246-3242

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeArterial transit time uncertainties and challenges during planning are potential issues for renal perfusion measurement using spatially selective arterial spin labeling techniques. To mitigate these potential issues, a spatially non-selective technique, such as velocity-selective arterial spin labeling (VSASL), could be an alternative. This article explores the influence of VSASL sequence parameters and respiratory induced motion on VS-label generation.

methodsVSASL data were acquired in human subjects (n = 15), with both single and dual labeling, during paced-breathing, while essential sequence parameters were systematically varied; (1) cutoff velocity, (2) labeling gradient orientation and (3) post-labeling delay (PLD). Pseudo-continuous ASL was acquired as a spatially selective reference. In an additional free-breathing single VSASL experiment (n = 9) we investigated respiratory motion influence on VS-labeling. Absolute renal blood flow (RBF), perfusion weighted signal (PWS), and temporal signal-to-noise ratio (tSNR) were determined.

results(1) With decreasing cutoff velocity, tSNR and PWS increased. However, undesired tissue labeling occurred at low cutoff velocities (≤ 5.4 cm/s). (2) Labeling gradient orientation had little effect on tSNR and PWS. (3) For single VSASL high signal appeared in the kidney pedicle at PLD < 800 ms, and tSNR and PWS decreased with increasing PLD. For dual VSASL, maximum tSNR occurred at PLD = 1200 ms. Average cortical RBF measured with dual VSASL (264 ± 34 mL/min/100 g) at a cutoff velocity of 5.4 cm/s, and feet-head labeling was slightly lower than with pseudo-continuous ASL (283 ± 55 mL/min/100 g).

conclusionWith well-chosen sequence parameters, tissue labeling induced by respiratory motion can be minimized, allowing to obtain good quality RBF maps using planning-free labeling with dual VSASL.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsPerfusion ImagingBlood Flow VelocityCerebrovascular CirculationHumansKidneyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMotionReproducibility of ResultsSpin LabelsSpin Labelsarterial spin labelingkidney functionmotion artifactsrenal perfusionvelocity-selective labeling

Identifiers

PMID32180263
PMCPMC7384062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.