ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2020
Influence of labeling parameters and respiratory motion on velocity-selective arterial spin labeling for renal perfusion imaging.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Velocity-selective excitation: Principles and applications.NMR in biomedicine · 2023Review
- Velocity-selective arterial spin labeling perfusion MRI: A review of the state of the art and recommendations for clinical implementation.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Review
- Perfusion imaging of neuroblastoma and nephroblastoma in a paediatric population using pseudo-continuous arterial spin-labelling magnetic resonance imaging.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2022Article
- Workflow for automatic renal perfusion quantification using ASL-MRI and machine learning.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Article
- Exploring label dynamics of velocity-selective arterial spin labeling in the kidney.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2021Article
- Multi-organ comparison of flow-based arterial spin labeling techniques: Spatially non-selective labeling for cerebral and renal perfusion imaging.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2021Article
- Influence of labeling parameters and respiratory motion on velocity-selective arterial spin labeling for renal perfusion imaging.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeArterial transit time uncertainties and challenges during planning are potential issues for renal perfusion measurement using spatially selective arterial spin labeling techniques. To mitigate these potential issues, a spatially non-selective technique, such as velocity-selective arterial spin labeling (VSASL), could be an alternative. This article explores the influence of VSASL sequence parameters and respiratory induced motion on VS-label generation.
methodsVSASL data were acquired in human subjects (n = 15), with both single and dual labeling, during paced-breathing, while essential sequence parameters were systematically varied; (1) cutoff velocity, (2) labeling gradient orientation and (3) post-labeling delay (PLD). Pseudo-continuous ASL was acquired as a spatially selective reference. In an additional free-breathing single VSASL experiment (n = 9) we investigated respiratory motion influence on VS-labeling. Absolute renal blood flow (RBF), perfusion weighted signal (PWS), and temporal signal-to-noise ratio (tSNR) were determined.
results(1) With decreasing cutoff velocity, tSNR and PWS increased. However, undesired tissue labeling occurred at low cutoff velocities (≤ 5.4 cm/s). (2) Labeling gradient orientation had little effect on tSNR and PWS. (3) For single VSASL high signal appeared in the kidney pedicle at PLD < 800 ms, and tSNR and PWS decreased with increasing PLD. For dual VSASL, maximum tSNR occurred at PLD = 1200 ms. Average cortical RBF measured with dual VSASL (264 ± 34 mL/min/100 g) at a cutoff velocity of 5.4 cm/s, and feet-head labeling was slightly lower than with pseudo-continuous ASL (283 ± 55 mL/min/100 g).
conclusionWith well-chosen sequence parameters, tissue labeling induced by respiratory motion can be minimized, allowing to obtain good quality RBF maps using planning-free labeling with dual VSASL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.