Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32180124›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2020

TargetCPP: accurate prediction of cell-penetrating peptides from optimized multi-scale features using gradient boost decision tree.

Muhammad Arif, Saeed Ahmad, Farman Ali, Ge Fang, Min Li, Dong-Jun Yu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Improving B-cell Linear Epitope PredictionCurrent drug targets · 2026
    Article
  4. DeepBBMC biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Muhammad ArifSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210094, China.
Saeed AhmadSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210094, China.
Farman AliSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210094, China.
Ge FangSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210094, China.
Min LiSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210094, China.
Dong-Jun YuSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210094, China. njyudj@njust.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) are short length permeable proteins have emerged as drugs delivery tool of therapeutic agents including genetic materials and macromolecules into cells. Recently, CPP has become a hotspot avenue for life science research and paved a new way of disease treatment without harmful impact on cell viability due to nontoxic characteristic. Therefore, the correct identification of CPPs will provide hints for medical applications. Considering the shortcomings of traditional experimental CPPs identification, it is urgently needed to design intelligent predictor for accurate identification of CPPs for the large scale uncharacterized sequences. We develop a novel computational method, called TargetCPP, to discriminate CPPs from Non-CPPs with improved accuracy. In TargetCPP, first the peptide sequences are formulated with four distinct encoding methods i.e., composite protein sequence representation, composition transition and distribution, split amino acid composition, and information theory features. These dominant feature vectors were fused and applied intelligent minimum redundancy and maximum relevancy feature selection method to choose an optimal subset of features. Finally, the predictive model is learned through different classification algorithms on the optimized features. Among these classifiers, gradient boost decision tree algorithm achieved excellent performance throughout the experiments. Notably, the TargetCPP tool attained high prediction Accuracy of 93.54% and 88.28% using jackknife and independent test, respectively. Empirical outcomes prove the superiority and potency of proposed bioinformatics method over state-of-the-art methods. It is highly anticipated that the outcomes of this study will provide a strong background for large scale prediction of CPPs and instructive guidance in clinical therapy and medical applications.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAmino Acid SequenceCell-Penetrating PeptidesComputational BiologyDecision TreesDrug Delivery SystemsHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsMachine LearningCell-Penetrating PeptidesCell-penetrating peptidesComposite protein sequence representationComposition transition and distributionGradient boostSplit amino acid composition

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.