ArticleArchives of microbiology2020
Responses of soil enzyme activities and plant growth in a eucalyptus seedling plantation amended with bacterial fertilizers.
Article in Archives of microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trichoderma-based fertilizer enhances quality of Elymus breviaristatus silage via microbial and metabolic modulation.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Structural equation model was used to evaluate the effects of soil chemical environment, fertility and enzyme activity on eucalyptus biomass.Royal Society open science · 2023Article
- Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Bacillus cereus Isolated from Brazilian Cerrado Soil Act as Phosphate-Solubilizing Bacteria.Current microbiology · 2023Article
- Effects ofPlant direct · 2022Article
- Organomineral fertilizer application enhancesFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Oak (Microorganisms · 2021Article
- Biochar and Rhizobacteria Amendments Improve Several Soil Properties and Bacterial Diversity.Microorganisms · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are widely used to improve plant nutrient uptake and assimilation and soil physicochemical properties. We investigated the effects of bacterial (Bacillus megaterium strain DU07) fertilizer applications in a eucalyptus (clone DH32-29) plantation in Guangxi, China in February 2011. We used two types of organic matter, i.e., fermented tapioca residue ("FTR") and filtered sludge from a sugar factory ("FS"). The following treatments were evaluated: (1) no PGPR and no organic matter applied (control), (2) 3 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.