Observational studyActa dermato-venereologica2020
Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Phototherapy: An Observational Study.
Observational study in Acta dermato-venereologica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of Narrowband Ultraviolet B Phototherapy Practices among Indian Dermatologists for Vitiligo.Indian dermatology online journal · 2026Article
- Development of Predictive Models for NB-UVB Treatment Efficacy and Safety in Psoriasis.Psoriasis (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this prospective study in a phototherapy unit was to describe adverse events (AEs) associated with discontinuation of phototherapy in a clinical setting. A total of 872 included patients received 1,256 courses of phototherapy treatment: 76.9% narrow-band UVB (NBUVB); 9.6% systemic psoralen plus UVA (PUVA); 11.4% topical PUVA; and 2.1% UVA. Approximately a fifth of the treatments (n = 240, 19.1%) were associated with AEs, the most frequent of which was erythema (8.8%). Systemic PUVA had the highest rate of AEs (32.5%). Mycosis fungoides was the dermatosis with the highest rate of AE (36.9%). A total of 216 (17.2%) patients stopped treatment: 23.6% because of AEs (4.1% of all treatments). Treatment suspension due to AEs was associated with PUVA, both topical and systemic (p < 0.001), and diagnoses of mycosis fungoides (p <0.001), palmoplantar psoriasis (p = 0.002), hand eczema (p = 0.002) and pityriasis lichenoides (p = 0.01). In conclusion, one in every 5 patients receiving phototherapy had an AE, but few stopped treatment for this reason.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.