ArticlePediatric research2020
Validation of the pediatric stroke outcome measure for classifying overall neurological deficit.
Article in Pediatric research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Consensus-Based Evaluation of Outcome Measures in Pediatric Stroke Care: A Toolkit.Pediatric neurology · 2023Guideline
- Association Between Thrombectomy and Functional Outcomes in Pediatric Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke From Large Vessel Occlusion.JAMA neurology · 2023Trial
- Incidence and outcome of paediatric cardioembolic stroke: a nationwide population-based study.European stroke journal · 2026Article
- Structural and Functional Imaging of Motor Outcomes in Twins With Perinatal Stroke: A Case Report.Annals of the Child Neurology Society · 2026Article
- Pediatric Intracerebral Hemorrhage Management-Consensus Statement of the International Pediatric Stroke Organization-Part 2: Outcomes, Rehabilitation, and Transition to Adulthood.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Review
- Neurodevelopmental outcome of perinatal intracranial haemorrhage in patients born at term: A prospective study.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2025Observational
- TOPSS: TOlerability of transcranial direct current stimulation in Pediatric Stroke Survivors.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- A scoping review of cerebral reperfusion therapies in childhood and adolescence with arterial ischemic stroke.Annals of the Child Neurology Society · 2024Review
- Outcomes in infants with unprovoked venous thromboembolism: A retrospective cohort study.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2023Article
- Language and Cognitive Outcomes Following Ischemic Stroke in Children With Monolingual and Bilingual Exposure.Journal of child neurology · 2023Article
- Commentary on "Validation of the Pediatric Stroke Outcome Measure for classifying overall neurological deficit".Pediatric research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe pediatric stroke outcome measure (PSOM) is a standardized, disease-specific outcome measure. We aimed to validate the overall classification of neurological deficit severity using PSOM.
methodsWe identified 367 neonates/children with arterial ischemic stroke (AIS) (Derivation Cohort). We analyzed the PSOM subscales (scored as 0 [no deficit], 0.5 [minimal/mild deficit; normal function], 1 [moderate deficit; slowing function], or 2 [severe deficit; missing function]) to derive severity levels using latent class analysis (LCA). We validated a severity classification scheme (PSOM-SCS) in: (a) children who had Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI; n = 63) and/or the Pediatric Quality-of-Life Inventory (PedsQL; n = 97) scored; and (b) an external cohort (AIS; n = 102) with concurrently scored modified Rankin Scale (mRS), King's Outcome Scale for Childhood Head-Injury (KOSCHI) and PSOM.
resultsWithin the Derivation Cohort, LCA identified three severity levels: "normal/mild," "moderate," and "severe" (83.7%, 13.3%, and 3%, respectively). We developed severity classification based on PSOM subscale scores: "normal/mild"-normal function in all domains or slowing in one domain, "moderate"-slowing in ≥2 domains or missing function in one domain, and "severe"-missing function in ≥2 domains or slowing in ≥1 plus missing in one domain. PEDI and PedsQL both differed significantly across the severity groups. PSOM-SCS displayed high concordance with mRS (agreement coefficient [AC2] = 0.88) and KOSCHI (AC2 = 0.79).
conclusionThe PSOM-SCS constitutes a valid tool for classifying overall neurological severity emphasizing function and encompassing the full range of severity in pediatric stroke. IMPACT: Arithmetic summing of the PSOM subscales scores to assess severity classification is inadequate.The prior severity classification using PSOM overestimates poor outcomes.Three distinct severity profiles using PSOM subscales are identified.The PSOM-SCS is in moderate to excellent agreement with other disability measures.PSOM-SCS offers a valid tool for classifying the overall neurological deficit severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.