Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32179822›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Congruency and reactivation aid memory integration through reinstatement of prior knowledge.

Marlieke T R van Kesteren, Paul Rignanese, Pierre G Gianferrara, Lydia Krabbendam, Martijn Meeter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. The hippocampus rapidly integrates sequence representations during novel multistep predictions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. The Assimilation of Novel Information into Schemata and Its Efficient Consolidation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marlieke T R van KesterenSection of Education Sciences and LEARN! Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. marlieke.van.kesteren@vu.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6765-7881
Paul RignaneseUnit of Neural Circuits Dynamics and Decision Making, Institut Pasteur, 75724, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1219-168X
Pierre G GianferraraDepartment of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, 15289, United States.
Lydia KrabbendamInstitute of Brain and Behavior Amsterdam, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Martijn MeeterSection of Education Sciences and LEARN! Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Building knowledge schemas that organize information and guide future learning is of great importance in everyday life. Such knowledge building is suggested to occur through reinstatement of prior knowledge during new learning, yielding integration of new with old memories supported by the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and medial temporal lobe (MTL). Congruency with prior knowledge is also known to enhance subsequent memory. Yet, how reactivation and congruency interact to optimize memory integration is unknown. To investigate this question, we used an adapted AB-AC inference paradigm in combination with functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI). Participants first studied an AB-association followed by an AC-association, so B (a scene) and C (an object) were indirectly linked through A (a pseudoword). BC-associations were either congruent or incongruent with prior knowledge (e.g. bathduck or hammer in a bathroom), and participants reported subjective B-reactivation strength while learning AC. Behaviorally, both congruency and reactivation enhanced memory integration. In the brain, these behavioral effects related to univariate and multivariate parametric effects in the MTL, mPFC, and Parahippocampal Place Area (PPA). Moreover, mPFC exhibited larger PPA-connectivity for more congruent associations. These outcomes provide insights into the neural mechanisms underlying memory enhancement, which has value for educational learning.

Indexed as

KnowledgeAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansLearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMemoryParahippocampal GyrusPrefrontal CortexTemporal LobeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32179822
PMCPMC7075880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.