ArticleNature communications2020
Parallel evolution of dominant pistil-side self-incompatibility suppressors in Arabidopsis.
Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dominance modifiers at the Arabidopsis self-incompatibility locus retain proto-miRNA features and act through non-canonical pathways.PLoS genetics · 2026Article
- Characterization of self-incompatibility genes inFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Molecular mechanisms and genetic regulation of self-incompatibility in flowering plants: implications for crop improvement and evolutionary biology.Plant molecular biology · 2025Review
- Investigating a role for PUB17 and PUB16 in the self-incompatibility signaling pathway in transgenicPlant direct · 2024Article
- Molecular insights into self-incompatibility systems: From evolution to breeding.Plant communications · 2024Review
- Comparative stigmatic transcriptomics reveals self and cross pollination responses to heteromorphic incompatibility inFrontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Molecular mechanisms of self-incompatibility in Brassicaceae and Solanaceae.Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences · 2024Review
- MLPK function is not required for self-incompatibility in the SPlant reproduction · 2023Article
- Autophagy is required for self-incompatible pollen rejection in two transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana accessions.Plant physiology · 2022Article
- Double-Locking Mechanism of Self-Compatibility inFrontiers in plant science · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Selfing is a frequent evolutionary trend in angiosperms, and is a suitable model for studying the recurrent patterns underlying adaptive evolution. Many plants avoid self-fertilization by physiological processes referred to as self-incompatibility (SI). In the Brassicaceae, direct and specific interactions between the male ligand SP11/SCR and the female receptor kinase SRK are required for the SI response. Although Arabidopsis thaliana acquired autogamy through loss of these genes, molecular evolution contributed to the spread of self-compatibility alleles requires further investigation. We show here that in this species, dominant SRK silencing genes have evolved at least twice. Different inverted repeat sequences were found in the relic SRK region of the Col-0 and C24 strains. Both types of inverted repeats suppress the functional SRK sequence in a dominant fashion with different target specificities. It is possible that these dominant suppressors of SI contributed to the rapid fixation of self-compatibility in A. thaliana.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.