Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32179700›Full record

ReviewNeurology2020

AAN position statement: Ethical issues in clinical research in neurology.

Benjamin Tolchin, Robin Conwit, Leon G Epstein, James A Russell, Ethics, Law, and Humanities Committee, a joint committee of the American Academy of Neurology, American Neurological Association, and Child Neurology Society

Abstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Benjamin TolchinFrom the Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurology (B.T.), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Epilepsy Center of Excellence, Neurology Service (B.T.), VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven; Division of Clinical Research (R.C.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, MD; Division of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics (L.G.E.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago; Stanley Manne Children's Research Institute (L.G.E.), Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, IL; and Division of Neurology (J.A.R.), Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA. benjamin.tolchin@yale.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9099-0022
Robin ConwitFrom the Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurology (B.T.), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Epilepsy Center of Excellence, Neurology Service (B.T.), VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven; Division of Clinical Research (R.C.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, MD; Division of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics (L.G.E.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago; Stanley Manne Children's Research Institute (L.G.E.), Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, IL; and Division of Neurology (J.A.R.), Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA.
Leon G EpsteinFrom the Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurology (B.T.), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Epilepsy Center of Excellence, Neurology Service (B.T.), VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven; Division of Clinical Research (R.C.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, MD; Division of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics (L.G.E.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago; Stanley Manne Children's Research Institute (L.G.E.), Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, IL; and Division of Neurology (J.A.R.), Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA.
James A RussellFrom the Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurology (B.T.), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Epilepsy Center of Excellence, Neurology Service (B.T.), VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven; Division of Clinical Research (R.C.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, MD; Division of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics (L.G.E.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago; Stanley Manne Children's Research Institute (L.G.E.), Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, IL; and Division of Neurology (J.A.R.), Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA.
Ethics, Law, and Humanities Committee, a joint committee of the American Academy of Neurology, American Neurological Association, and Child Neurology Society

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This update to the American Academy of Neurology's 1998 position statement endeavors to provide guidance for the consistent ethical conduct and review of neurologic research involving human participants. It does so by outlining a widely used ethical framework of 7 principles derived from the foundational documents of modern bioethics, including the Nuremberg Code, the World Medical Association's Declaration of Helsinki, the Belmont Report, and the US Department of Health and Human Service's Common Rule. The position statement then applies this principle-based framework to analyze and produce recommendations for the management of common and important ethical issues encountered in neurologic clinical research. These include institutional review board oversight, equitable research participant inclusion, cognitive impairment in research participants, international studies, the replication crisis, and genetic testing and modification.

Indexed as

BioethicsBiomedical ResearchHumansInformed ConsentNeurologySocieties, MedicalUnited States

Identifiers

PMID32179700
PMCPMC7251519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.