Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32179677›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Oxaliplatin Pt(IV) prodrugs conjugated to gadolinium-texaphyrin as potential antitumor agents.

Grégory Thiabaud, Guangan He, Sajal Sen, Kathryn A Shelton, Wallace B Baze, Luke Segura, Julie Alaniz, Ruben Munoz Macias, Greg Lyness, Alan B Watts and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. A Pt(IV)-conjugated brain penetrant macrocyclic peptide shows pre-clinical efficacy in glioblastoma.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Profile of Jonathan L. Sessler.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Grégory ThiabaudDepartment of Chemistry, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712-1224.
Guangan HeDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030.
Sajal SenDepartment of Chemistry, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712-1224.
Kathryn A SheltonDepartment of Comparative Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Bastrop, TX 78602.
Wallace B BazeDepartment of Comparative Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Bastrop, TX 78602.
Luke SeguraDepartment of Comparative Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Bastrop, TX 78602.
Julie AlanizDepartment of Chemistry, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712-1224.
Ruben Munoz MaciasDepartment of Chemistry, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712-1224.
Greg LynessDrug Dynamics Institute, College of Pharmacy, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712-1224.
Alan B WattsDrug Dynamics Institute, College of Pharmacy, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712-1224.
Hyun Min KimResearch Center for Bioconvergence Analysis, Korea Basic Science Institute, Cheongju 28119, Korea.
Hyunseung LeeResearch Center for Bioconvergence Analysis, Korea Basic Science Institute, Cheongju 28119, Korea.
Mi Young ChoResearch Center for Bioconvergence Analysis, Korea Basic Science Institute, Cheongju 28119, Korea.
Kwan Soo HongResearch Center for Bioconvergence Analysis, Korea Basic Science Institute, Cheongju 28119, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4342-5183
Rick FinchDepartment of Comparative Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Bastrop, TX 78602; rafinch@mdanderson.org zsiddik@mdanderson.org jfarambula@cm.utexas.edu sessler@cm.utexas.edu.
Zahid H SiddikDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030; rafinch@mdanderson.org zsiddik@mdanderson.org jfarambula@cm.utexas.edu sessler@cm.utexas.edu.
Jonathan F ArambulaDepartment of Chemistry, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712-1224; rafinch@mdanderson.org zsiddik@mdanderson.org jfarambula@cm.utexas.edu sessler@cm.utexas.edu.
Jonathan L SesslerDepartment of Chemistry, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712-1224; rafinch@mdanderson.org zsiddik@mdanderson.org jfarambula@cm.utexas.edu sessler@cm.utexas.edu.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Biomedical Applications of Expanded Porphyrins: Development of Gold-Texaphyrin ConjugatesR01CA068682 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI Esther Y. Maier, Emily L Que · 1995 to 2026
$7.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS R01 CA068682
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Described here is the development of gadolinium(III) texaphyrin-platinum(IV) conjugates capable of overcoming platinum resistance by 1) localizing to solid tumors, 2) promoting enhanced cancer cell uptake, and 3) reactivating p53 in platinum-resistant models. Side by side comparative studies of these Pt(IV) conjugates to clinically approved platinum(II) agents and previously reported platinum(II)-texaphyrin conjugates demonstrate that the present Pt(IV) conjugates are more stable against hydrolysis and nucleophilic attack. Moreover, they display high potent antiproliferative activity in vitro against human and mouse cell cancer lines. Relative to the current platinum clinical standard of care (SOC), a lead Gd(III) texaphyrin-Pt(IV) prodrug conjugate emerging from this development effort was found to be more efficacious in subcutaneous (s.c.) mouse models involving both cell-derived xenografts and platinum-resistant patient-derived xenografts. Comparative pathology studies in mice treated with equimolar doses of the lead Gd texaphyrin-Pt(IV) conjugate or the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved agent oxaliplatin revealed that the conjugate was better tolerated. Specifically, the lead could be dosed at more than three times (i.e., 70 mg/kg per dose) the tolerable dose of oxaliplatin (i.e., 4 to 6 mg/kg per dose depending on the animal model) with little to no observable adverse effects. A combination of tumor localization, redox cycling, and reversible protein binding is invoked to explain the relatively increased tolerability and enhanced anticancer activity seen in vivo. On the basis of the present studies, we conclude that metallotexaphyrin-Pt conjugates may have substantial clinical potential as antitumor agents.

Indexed as

A549 CellsAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleHCT116 CellsHumansMetalloporphyrinsMice, NudeOxaliplatinProdrugsTissue DistributionTumor Suppressor Protein p53Xenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAntineoplastic AgentsMetalloporphyrinsmotexafin gadoliniumOxaliplatinProdrugsTumor Suppressor Protein p53cancerdrug developmentdrug resistanceplatinum prodrugtexaphyrins

Identifiers

PMID32179677
PMCPMC7132275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.