Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32179666›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Predictions drive neural representations of visual events ahead of incoming sensory information.

Tessel Blom, Daniel Feuerriegel, Philippa Johnson, Stefan Bode, Hinze Hogendoorn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Representing stimulus motion with waves in adaptive neural fields.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Visual Information Is Predictively Encoded in Occipital Alpha/Low-Beta Oscillations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tessel BlomMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia; tblom@student.unimelb.edu.au.
Daniel FeuerriegelMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia.
Philippa JohnsonMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia.
Stefan BodeMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0258-7795
Hinze HogendoornMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The transmission of sensory information through the visual system takes time. As a result of these delays, the visual information available to the brain always lags behind the timing of events in the present moment. Compensating for these delays is crucial for functioning within dynamic environments, since interacting with a moving object (e.g., catching a ball) requires real-time localization of the object. One way the brain might achieve this is via prediction of anticipated events. Using time-resolved decoding of electroencephalographic (EEG) data, we demonstrate that the visual system represents the anticipated future position of a moving object, showing that predictive mechanisms activate the same neural representations as afferent sensory input. Importantly, this activation is evident before sensory input corresponding to the stimulus position is able to arrive. Finally, we demonstrate that, when predicted events do not eventuate, sensory information arrives too late to prevent the visual system from representing what was expected but never presented. Taken together, we demonstrate how the visual system can implement predictive mechanisms to preactivate sensory representations, and argue that this might allow it to compensate for its own temporal constraints, allowing us to interact with dynamic visual environments in real time.

Indexed as

AdultBrainElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleModels, NeurologicalMotion PerceptionPhotic StimulationPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeVision, OcularVisual PathwaysVisual Perceptionneural delayspredictiontime-resolved decodingvisual system

Identifiers

PMID32179666
PMCPMC7132318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.