Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32179610›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM

Factors Influencing Uptake of Changes to Clinical Preventive Guidelines.

Vivian Jiang, E Marshall Brooks, Sebastian T Tong, John Heintzman, Alex H Krist

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on surgical treatments for spinal metastasis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Interest in Medication Deprescribing Among US Adults Aged 50-80.Journal of general internal medicine · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Iowa Implementation for Sustainability Framework.Implementation science : IS · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vivian JiangFrom the Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA (VJ, EMB, AHK); Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR (JH); Oregon Community Health Information Network (OCHIN), Portland OR (JH). Vivian.Jiang@cuanschutz.edu.
E Marshall BrooksFrom the Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA (VJ, EMB, AHK); Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR (JH); Oregon Community Health Information Network (OCHIN), Portland OR (JH).
Sebastian T TongFrom the Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA (VJ, EMB, AHK); Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR (JH); Oregon Community Health Information Network (OCHIN), Portland OR (JH).
John HeintzmanFrom the Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA (VJ, EMB, AHK); Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR (JH); Oregon Community Health Information Network (OCHIN), Portland OR (JH).
Alex H KristFrom the Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA (VJ, EMB, AHK); Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR (JH); Oregon Community Health Information Network (OCHIN), Portland OR (JH).

Funding

Research Supplement to Promote Diversity in Health Related ResearchUL1TR002649 · NCATS · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI MOELLER, FREDERICK GERARD · 2018 to 2022
$19.1M
Implementing Personal Health Records to Promote Evidence-Based Cancer ScreeningR01CA168795 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI KRIST, ALEXANDER H · 2013 to 2017
$3.0M
Understanding Health System, Practice, Clinician and Patient Factors Associated with the Implementation of New Clinical Practice GuidelinesR03HS025032 · AHRQ · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI TONG, SEBASTIAN · 2016 to 2016
$100k
AHRQ HHS R03 HS025032NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002649NCI NIH HHS R01 CA168795
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite widespread recognition that adherence to clinical preventive guidelines improves patient outcomes, clinicians struggle to implement guideline changes in a timely manner. Multiple factors influence guideline adoption and effective implementation. However, few studies evaluate their collective and inter-related effects. This qualitative study provides a comprehensive picture of the interplay between multiple factors on uptake of new or changed preventive guidelines.

methodsSemistructured interviews conducted in 2018 with a diverse sample of clinicians and practice leaders sought to understand patient, clinician, practice, health system, environment, and guideline factors of influence. An immersion-crystallization approach was used to identify emergent themes.

resultsInterviewees expressed motivation to adhere to guidelines but also valued sharing decisions with patients. Personal biases and fears affected both clinician and patient guideline adoption. Practices facilitated implementation through workflow optimization and encouraging a culture of evidence-based practice while a key health system function was to maintain electronic health record alerts. More traditional environmental factors, such as insurance coverage or transportation, were less of a barrier to guideline adoption and implementation than the influence of media and specialists. Various specific guideline characteristics also affected ease of adoption and implementation. Different settings expressed greater health system, practice, or clinician-centric approaches to guideline implementation.

conclusionsGuideline uptake is influenced by a complex interplay of multiple levels of factors including the patient, clinician, practice, health system, environment, and guideline levels. Comprehensively understanding all levels of influence for each specific clinical setting may help to determine the optimal intervention(s) for improving uptake of evidence-based guidelines.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based PracticeGuideline AdherenceHumansQualitative ResearchWorkflowEvidence-Based MedicineImplementation SciencePreventive MedicineQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID32179610
PMCPMC7170012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.