Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32179480›Full record

ArticleiScience2020

Positive Selection of a Serine Residue in Bat IRF3 Confers Enhanced Antiviral Protection.

Arinjay Banerjee, Xi Zhang, Alyssa Yip, Katharina S Schulz, Aaron T Irving, Dawn Bowdish, Brian Golding, Lin-Fa Wang, Karen Mossman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Antiviral effects of interferon-stimulated genes in bats.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. DNA double-strand break repair and nucleic acid-related immunity.Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Alternative Animal Models of Aging Research.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Arinjay BanerjeeMichael DeGroote Institute for Infectious Disease Research, McMaster Immunology Research Centre, Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada.
Xi ZhangDepartment of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada.
Alyssa YipMichael DeGroote Institute for Infectious Disease Research, McMaster Immunology Research Centre, Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada.
Katharina S SchulzMichael DeGroote Institute for Infectious Disease Research, McMaster Immunology Research Centre, Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada.
Aaron T IrvingProgramme in Emerging Infectious Disease, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore.
Dawn BowdishMichael DeGroote Institute for Infectious Disease Research, McMaster Immunology Research Centre, Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada.
Brian GoldingDepartment of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada.
Lin-Fa WangProgramme in Emerging Infectious Disease, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore.
Karen MossmanMichael DeGroote Institute for Infectious Disease Research, McMaster Immunology Research Centre, Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada. Electronic address: mossk@mcmaster.ca.
McMaster University Medical Centre · CADuke-NUS Medical School · SGMcMaster University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compared with other mammals, bats harbor more zoonotic viruses per species and do not demonstrate signs of disease on infection with these viruses. To counteract infections with viruses, bats have evolved enhanced mechanisms to limit virus replication and immunopathology. However, molecular and cellular drivers of antiviral responses in bats largely remain an enigma. In this study, we demonstrate that a serine residue in IRF3 is positively selected for in multiple bat species. IRF3 is a central regulator of innate antiviral responses in mammals. Replacing the serine residue in bat IRF3 with the human leucine residue decreased antiviral protection in bat cells, whereas the addition of this serine residue in human IRF3 significantly enhanced antiviral protection in human cells. Our study provides genetic and functional evidence for enhanced IRF3-mediated antiviral responses in bats and adds support to speculations that bats have positively selected for multiple adaptations in their antiviral immune responses.

Indexed as

Biological SciencesEvolutionary BiologyImmunology

Identifiers

PMID32179480
PMCPMC7075978
OpenAlexW3009388533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.