Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32179367›Full record

ArticlePsychoneuroendocrinology2020

Investigating hormone-induced changes in affective state using the affective bias test in male and female rats.

Justyna K Hinchcliffe, Michael Mendl, Emma S J Robinson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychoneuroendocrinology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparing affective bias modification by first- and second-generation antidepressants in male rats using a translational behavioural task.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Pathogens, odors, and disgust in rodents.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Justyna K HinchcliffeUniversity of Bristol, School of Physiology, Pharmacology & Neuroscience, Biomedical Sciences Building, University Walk, Bristol, BS8 1TD, UK.
Michael MendlSchool of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford, Bristol BS40 5DU, UK.
Emma S J RobinsonUniversity of Bristol, School of Physiology, Pharmacology & Neuroscience, Biomedical Sciences Building, University Walk, Bristol, BS8 1TD, UK. Electronic address: Emma.S.J.Robinson@bristol.ac.uk.
University of Bristol · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L009137/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent clinical and pre-clinical research suggests that affective biases may play an important role in the development and perpetuation of mood disorders. Studies in animals have also revealed that similar neuropsychological processes can be measured in non-human species using behavioural assays designed to measure biases in learning and memory or decision-making. Given the proposed links between hormones and mood, we used the affective bias test to investigate the effects of different hormone treatments in both male and female rats. Animals were pre-treated with acute doses of hormone or vehicle control prior to learning each of two independent substrate-reward associations. During a subsequent choice test, positive or negative biases were observed by animal's preference towards or away from the substrate learnt during drug treatment respectively. In both sexes, oestradiol and the oestrogen-like compound bisphenol A induced positive biases, whilst blockade of oestrogen hormones with formestane induced a negative bias. Progesterone induced a negative bias in both sexes, but testosterone only induced a negative bias in males. Blocking testosterone with flutamide induced a positive bias in both sexes at the higher dose (10 mg/kg). The oxytocin analogue, carbetocin induced positive biases in both sexes but the vasopressin analogue, desmopressin, induced a positive bias in male rats only. These results provide evidence that modulating levels of hormones using exogenous treatments can induce affective biases in rats. They also suggest that hormone-induced affective biases influence cognitive and emotional behaviour and could have longer-term effects in some mood disorders.

Indexed as

AffectAndrostenedioneAnimalsBehavior, AnimalBenzhydryl CompoundsBisphenol A CompoundsDeamino Arginine VasopressinEstradiolFemaleFlutamideHormonesMaleOxytocinPhenolsProgesteroneRatsAndrostenedioneBenzhydryl Compoundsbisphenol ABisphenol A CompoundscarbetocinDeamino Arginine VasopressinEstradiolFlutamideformestaneHormonesOxytocinPhenolsProgesteroneTestosteroneAffective biasCarbetocinDesmopressinOestradiolProgesteroneTestosterone

Identifiers

PMID32179367
PMCPMC7193894
OpenAlexW3010336097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.