Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32179191›Full record

ArticleWorld neurosurgery2020

Woven Endobridge (WEB) Device as a Retreatment Strategy After Unsuccessful Surgical Clipping.

Thomas C Booth, Carmen Parra-Farinas, Ruth-Mary deSouza, Naga Kandasamy, Jo Bhattacharya, Prem Rangi, Jonathan Downer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World neurosurgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. WEB vs coiling in ruptured aneurysms: A propensity score matched comparison of safety and efficacy.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Thomas C BoothSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Neuroradiology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: tombooth@doctors.org.uk.
Carmen Parra-FarinasDepartment of Neuroradiology, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ruth-Mary deSouzaDepartment of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Naga KandasamyDepartment of Neuroradiology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Jo BhattacharyaDepartment of Neuroradiology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Prem RangiDepartment of Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom.
Jonathan DownerDepartment of Neuroradiology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre · SAKing's College London · GBNational Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery · GBSt. Michael's Hospital · CAWestern General Hospital · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 203148
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgical clipping of intracranial aneurysms is typically robust and durable. However, residual aneurysmal components may be seen after clipping. Furthermore, there may be occasional aneurysmal recurrence. These factors are both clinically relevant because subarachnoid hemorrhage after clipping is a rare but important event. The rationale for any treatment is to substantially decrease the future risk of hemorrhage. Small series have shown coiling as a retreatment strategy after unsuccessful clipping, but none has explored the feasibility of Woven Endobridge (WEB) implantation. CASE DESCRIPTION: We examined the feasibility of WEB implantation as second-line treatment for wide-necked residual aneurysms after unsuccessful clipping. We also recorded the safety and efficacy in this small series of 6 patients. To determine safety, we measured the modified Rankin Scale score before and after the procedure, and at 2 later time points (mean follow-up, 5 months and 15 months). To determine efficacy, we obtained radiographic aneurysm occlusion outcomes (including WEB Occlusion Scale) at these 2 time points. Four middle cerebral artery and 2 anterior communicating artery complex aneurysms were treated with WEB implantation, showing feasibility in 6/6 cases (100%). Follow-up at 15 months showed no change from preprocedural modified Rankin Scale score and there were no other complications. There was adequate occlusion in 5/6 cases (83%).

conclusionsWEB implantation provided a feasible option in this challenging retreatment scenario. This is a small series and prospective data are required to make outcome inferences for this population. Nonetheless, we observed no complications and high adequate occlusion rates.

Indexed as

Angiography, Digital SubtractionCerebral AngiographyEmbolization, TherapeuticEndovascular ProceduresFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalIntracranial AneurysmMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMaleMiddle AgedMiddle Cerebral ArteryProstheses and ImplantsProsthesis ImplantationRetreatmentSubarachnoid HemorrhageAneurysm remnantEndovascular treatmentIntrasaccular deviceRecurrent aneurysmResidual aneurysmSurgical clippingWoven Endobridge (WEB)

Identifiers

PMID32179191
PMCPMC7611019
OpenAlexW3011765188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.