Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32178849›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanics2020

Positioning and baby devices impact infant spinal muscle activity.

Safeer F Siddicky, David B Bumpass, Akshay Krishnan, Stewart A Tackett, Richard E McCarthy, Erin M Mannen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Ultrasonographic evaluation of infant hips in the Pavlik harness compared to body-worn commercial baby carriers.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2023
    Article
  13. Exploring infant hip position and muscle activity in common baby gear and orthopedic devices.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Safeer F SiddickyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States.
David B BumpassDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States.
Akshay KrishnanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States.
Stewart A TackettDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States.
Richard E McCarthyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States.
Erin M MannenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States. Electronic address: erinmannen@gmail.com.
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · US

Funding

Understanding the Negative Prognostic Impact of Intraosseous Focal Lesions in Multiple MyelomaP20GM125503 · NIGMS · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI CHARLES A O'BRIEN · 2018 to 2026
$23.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM125503
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infant positioning in daily life, particularly in relation to active neck and back muscles, may affect spinal development, psychosocial progression, and motor milestone achievement. Yet the impact of infant body position on muscle activity is unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate neck and back muscle activity of healthy infants in common positions and baby devices. Healthy full-term infants (n = 22, 2-6 months) participated in this experimental study. Daily sleep and positioning were reported by caregivers. Cervical paraspinal and erector spinae muscle activity was measured using surface electromyography (EMG) in five positions: lying prone, lying supine, held in-arms, held in a baby carrier, and buckled into a car seat. Mean filtered EMG signal and time that muscles were active were calculated. Paired t-tests were used to compare positions to the prone condition. Caregivers reported that infants spent 12% of daily awake time prone, 43% in supine-lying baby gear, and 44% held in-arms or upright in a baby carrier. Infants exhibited highest erector spinae activity when prone, and lowest cervical paraspinal muscle activity in the car seat. No differences were found between in-arms carrying and babywearing. This first evaluation of the muscle activity of healthy infants supports the importance of prone time in infants' early spinal development because it promotes neck and back muscle activity. Carrying babies in-arms or in baby carriers may also be beneficial to neck muscle development, while prolonged time spent in car seats or containment devices may be detrimental to spinal development.

Indexed as

PostureSpineChild DevelopmentElectromyographyHumansInfantProne PositionSupine PositionDevelopmentElectromyographyInfantProne playTummy time

Identifiers

PMID32178849
PMCPMC7188598
OpenAlexW3011033334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.