Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32178729›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2020

Lifting the veil on arid-to-hyperarid Antarctic soil microbiomes: a tale of two oases.

Eden Zhang, Loïc M Thibaut, Aleks Terauds, Mark Raven, Mark M Tanaka, Josie van Dorst, Sin Yin Wong, Sally Crane, Belinda C Ferrari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Comparative analysis of bacterial diversity in accumulated snow and exposed sediments across Antarctic Islands.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The ecological roles of microbial lipopeptides: Where are we going?Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Eden ZhangSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2052, Australia.
Loïc M ThibautSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2052, Australia.
Aleks TeraudsAustralian Antarctic Division, Department of Environment, Antarctic Conservation and Management, 203 Channel Highway, Kingston, TAS, 7050, Australia.
Mark RavenCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Mineralogical Services, Urrbrae, SA, 5064, Australia.
Mark M TanakaSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2052, Australia.
Josie van DorstSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2052, Australia.
Sin Yin WongSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2052, Australia.
Sally CraneSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2052, Australia.
Belinda C FerrariSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2052, Australia. b.ferrari@unsw.edu.au.

Funding

ARC Future Fellowship FT170100341Australian Antarctic Science Grants Scheme AAS-4406
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResident soil microbiota play key roles in sustaining the core ecosystem processes of terrestrial Antarctica, often involving unique taxa with novel functional traits. However, the full scope of biodiversity and the niche-neutral processes underlying these communities remain unclear. In this study, we combine multivariate analyses, co-occurrence networks and fitted species abundance distributions on an extensive set of bacterial, micro-eukaryote and archaeal amplicon sequencing data to unravel soil microbiome patterns of nine sites across two east Antarctic regions, the Vestfold Hills and Windmill Islands. To our knowledge, this is the first microbial biodiversity report on the hyperarid Vestfold Hills soil environment.

resultsOur findings reveal distinct regional differences in phylogenetic composition, abundance and richness amongst microbial taxa. Actinobacteria dominated soils in both regions, yet Bacteroidetes were more abundant in the Vestfold Hills compared to the Windmill Islands, which contained a high abundance of novel phyla. However, intra-region comparisons demonstrate greater homogeneity of soil microbial communities and measured environmental parameters between sites at the Vestfold Hills. Community richness is largely driven by a variable suite of parameters but robust associations between co-existing members highlight potential interactions and sharing of niche space by diverse taxa from all three microbial domains of life examined. Overall, non-neutral processes appear to structure the polar soil microbiomes studied here, with niche partitioning being particularly strong for bacterial communities at the Windmill Islands. Eukaryotic and archaeal communities reveal weaker niche-driven signatures accompanied by multimodality, suggesting the emergence of neutrality.

conclusionWe provide new information on assemblage patterns, environmental drivers and non-random occurrences for Antarctic soil microbiomes, particularly the Vestfold Hills, where basic diversity, ecology and life history strategies of resident microbiota are largely unknown. Greater understanding of these basic ecological concepts is a pivotal step towards effective conservation management.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaSoil MicrobiologyAntarctic RegionsBacteriaBiodiversityEcosystemPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilAntarcticaArchaeaBacteriaConservation EcologyEukaryaSoil Microbiome

Identifiers

PMID32178729
PMCPMC7076931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.