Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32178719›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2020

Variation in the response of bovine alveolar lavage cells to diverse species of probiotic bacteria.

Susan D Eicher, Carol G Chitko-McKown, Keith A Bryan

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Susan D EicherUSDA-Agricultural Research Service Livestock Behavior Research Unit, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Carol G Chitko-McKownUSDA-Agricultural Research Service U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE, 68933, USA. carol.chitkomckown@usda.gov.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7496-2988
Keith A BryanChr. Hansen, Inc., Animal Health & Nutrition, Milwaukee, WI, 53214, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveProbiotics are fed to improve enteric health, and they may also affect respiratory immunity through their exposure to the upper respiratory tract upon ingestion. However, their effect on the respiratory system is not known. Our aim was to determine how probiotics affect functions and markers of bronchoalveolar lung lavage cells (BAL) isolated from lungs of calves at slaughter.

resultsTreatments consisted of ten probiotic species and one control treatment. Probiotics and BAL were incubated 1:1 for 2 h at 37 °C and 5% CO

Indexed as

Alveolar Epithelial CellsAnimalsAntigens, CDCattleCD18 AntigensEnterococcus faeciumFluorescenceLectins, C-TypeLeukocytesLipopolysaccharide ReceptorsLungMinor Histocompatibility AntigensPhagocytosisProbioticsPropionibacterium freudenreichiiReceptors, Cell SurfaceAntigens, CDCD18 AntigensDEC-205 receptorLectins, C-TypeLipopolysaccharide ReceptorsMinor Histocompatibility AntigensReceptors, Cell SurfaceBovineLeukocyteLungPhagocytosisProbiotic

Identifiers

PMID32178719
PMCPMC7077026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.