Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32178689›Full record

ArticleFluids and barriers of the CNS2020

In vitro and numerical simulation of blood removal from cerebrospinal fluid: comparison of lumbar drain to Neurapheresis therapy.

Mohammadreza Khani, Lucas R Sass, M Keith Sharp, Aaron R McCabe, Laura M Zitella Verbick, Shivanand P Lad, Bryn A Martin

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Fluids and barriers of the CNS, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Computational Fluid Dynamics of Cerebrospinal Fluid.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Physics of fluids (Woodbury, N.Y. : 1994) · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mohammadreza KhaniDepartment of Biological Engineering, The University of Idaho, 875 Perimeter Drive, MS 0904, Moscow, ID, 83844-0904, USA.
Lucas R SassDepartment of Biological Engineering, The University of Idaho, 875 Perimeter Drive, MS 0904, Moscow, ID, 83844-0904, USA.
M Keith SharpDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Louisville, 332 Eastern Pkwy, Louisville, KY, 40292, USA.
Aaron R McCabeMinnetronix Neuro, Inc., 1635 Energy Park Dr, Saint Paul, MN, 55108, USA.
Laura M Zitella VerbickMinnetronix Neuro, Inc., 1635 Energy Park Dr, Saint Paul, MN, 55108, USA.
Shivanand P LadDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, 3100 Tower Blvd, Durham, NC, 27707, USA.
Bryn A MartinDepartment of Biological Engineering, The University of Idaho, 875 Perimeter Drive, MS 0904, Moscow, ID, 83844-0904, USA. brynm@uidaho.edu.
University of Idaho · USMinnetronix (United States) · USDuke University · USUniversity of Louisville · US

Funding

Women's health: interplay of maternal diet and key demographics on neurological health in the rural frontier and remote WestP20GM103408 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO · PI Carolyn Hovde Bohach · 2012 to 2026
$59.8M
Tracking and EvaluationU54GM104944 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS · PI ZHU, YILIANG · 2013 to 2023
$39.6M
Highly Accelerated Simultaneous Multi-Slice Phase Contrast MRIR44MH112210 · NIMH · ADVANCED MRI TECHNOLOGY, LLC · PI FEINBERG, DAVID ALAN · 2016 to 2017
$2.7M
Establishing a Novel Neural Tissue Deformation Biomarker for Type 1 Chiari MalformationR01NS111283 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO · PI LUCIANO, MARK GREGORY · 2019 to 2023
$1.8M
Institutional Development Award 4U54GM104944-04TBDInstitutional Development Award P20GM1033408National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Grant R01NS111283NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103408NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104944NIMH NIH HHS 1R44MH112210-01A1NIMH NIH HHS R44 MH112210NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS111283
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBlood removal from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in post-subarachnoid hemorrhage patients may reduce the risk of related secondary brain injury. We formulated a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model to investigate the impact of a dual-lumen catheter-based CSF filtration system, called Neurapheresis™ therapy, on blood removal from CSF compared to lumbar drain.

methodsA subject-specific multiphase CFD model of CSF system-wide solute transport was constructed based on MRI measurements. The Neurapheresis catheter geometry was added to the model within the spinal subarachnoid space (SAS). Neurapheresis flow aspiration and return rate was 2.0 and 1.8 mL/min, versus 0.2 mL/min drainage for lumbar drain. Blood was modeled as a bulk fluid phase within CSF with a 10% initial tracer concentration and identical viscosity and density as CSF. Subject-specific oscillatory CSF flow was applied at the model inlet. The dura and spinal cord geometry were considered to be stationary. Spatial-temporal tracer concentration was quantified based on time-average steady-streaming velocities throughout the domain under Neurapheresis therapy and lumbar drain. To help verify CFD results, an optically clear in vitro CSF model was constructed with fluorescein used as a blood surrogate. Quantitative comparison of numerical and in vitro results was performed by linear regression of spatial-temporal tracer concentration over 24-h.

resultsAfter 24-h, tracer concentration was reduced to 4.9% under Neurapheresis therapy compared to 6.5% under lumbar drain. Tracer clearance was most rapid between the catheter aspiration and return ports. Neurapheresis therapy was found to have a greater impact on steady-streaming compared to lumbar drain. Steady-streaming in the cranial SAS was ~ 50× smaller than in the spinal SAS for both cases. CFD results were strongly correlated with the in vitro spatial-temporal tracer concentration under Neurapheresis therapy (R

conclusionA subject-specific CFD model of CSF system-wide solute transport was used to investigate the impact of Neurapheresis therapy on tracer removal from CSF compared to lumbar drain over a 24-h period. Neurapheresis therapy was found to substantially increase tracer clearance compared to lumbar drain. The multiphase CFD results were verified by in vitro fluorescein tracer experiments.

Indexed as

BloodCathetersCerebrospinal FluidDrainageEquipment DesignModels, BiologicalSpinal PunctureAdultBlood Component RemovalFemaleHumansHydrodynamicsMagnetic Resonance ImagingSubarachnoid HemorrhageYoung AdultCerebrospinal fluid filtrationComputational fluid dynamicsIn-vitro modelMultiphase simulationNeurapheresis therapySubarachnoid hemorrhage

Identifiers

PMID32178689
PMCPMC7077023
OpenAlexW3012471534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.