Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32178677›Full record

ArticleMicrobial cell factories2020

Robust microorganisms for biofuel and chemical production from municipal solid waste.

Aritha Dornau, James F Robson, Gavin H Thomas, Simon J McQueen-Mason

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial cell factories, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Biobutanol production from underutilized substrates usingCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2024
    Review
  4. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aritha DornauCentre for Novel Agricultural Products (CNAP), Department of Biology, University of York, Heslington, YO10 5DD, York, UK.
James F RobsonDepartment of Biology, University of York, Heslington, YO10 5DD, York, UK.
Gavin H ThomasDepartment of Biology, University of York, Heslington, YO10 5DD, York, UK.
Simon J McQueen-MasonCentre for Novel Agricultural Products (CNAP), Department of Biology, University of York, Heslington, YO10 5DD, York, UK. simon.mcqueenmason@york.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6781-4768
University of York · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M014916/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWorldwide 3.4 billion tonnes of municipal solid waste (MSW) will be produced annually by 2050, however, current approaches to MSW management predominantly involve unsustainable practices like landfilling and incineration. The organic fraction of MSW (OMSW) typically comprises ~ 50% lignocellulose-rich material but is underexplored as a biomanufacturing feedstock due to its highly inconsistent and heterogeneous composition. This study sought to overcome the limitations associated with studying MSW-derived feedstocks by using OMSW produced from a realistic and reproducible MSW mixture on a commercial autoclave system. The resulting OMSW fibre was enzymatically hydrolysed and used to screen diverse microorganisms of biotechnological interest to identify robust species capable of fermenting this complex feedstock.

resultsThe autoclave pre-treated OMSW fibre contained a polysaccharide fraction comprising 38% cellulose and 4% hemicellulose. Enzymatic hydrolysate of OMSW fibre was high in D-glucose (5.5% w/v) and D-xylose (1.8%w/v) but deficient in nitrogen and phosphate. Although relatively low levels of levulinic acid (30 mM) and vanillin (2 mM) were detected and furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural were absent, the hydrolysate contained an abundance of potentially toxic metals (0.6% w/v). Hydrolysate supplemented with 1% yeast extract to alleviate nutrient limitation was used in a substrate-oriented shake-flask screen with eight biotechnologically useful microorganisms (Clostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum, Escherichia coli, Geobacillus thermoglucosidasius, Pseudomonas putida, Rhodococcus opacus, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Schizosaccharomyces pombe and Zymomonas mobilis). Each species' growth and productivity were characterised and three species were identified that robustly and efficiently fermented OMSW fibre hydrolysate without significant substrate inhibition: Z. mobilis, S. cerevisiae and R. opacus, respectively produced product to 69%, 70% and 72% of the maximum theoretical fermentation yield and could theoretically produce 136 kg and 139 kg of ethanol and 91 kg of triacylglycerol (TAG) per tonne of OMSW.

conclusionsDeveloping an integrated biorefinery around MSW has the potential to significantly alleviate the environmental burden of current waste management practices. Substrate-oriented screening of a representative and reproducible OMSW-derived fibre identified microorganisms intrinsically suited to growth on OMSW hydrolysates. These species are promising candidates for developing an MSW biorefining platform and provide a foundation for future studies aiming to valorise this underexplored feedstock.

Indexed as

BacteriaBiofuelsBiosolidsCelluloseEthanolFermentationFungiPolysaccharidesTriglyceridesBiofuelsBiosolidsCelluloseEthanolhemicellulosePolysaccharidesTriglyceridesAviation fuelBiodieselBioethanolBiorefineryCellulosicMSWOrganic municipal solid wasteRhodococcus opacusSaccharomyces cerevisiaeZymomonas mobilis

Identifiers

PMID32178677
PMCPMC7077162
OpenAlexW3012143369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.