Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32178514›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2020

An Improved P

Gen Li, Trevor V Nykaza, Julian C Cooper, Antonio Ramirez, Michael R Luzung, Alexander T Radosevich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Tetrahedron · 2025
    Article
  2. Beyond BODIPY: dipyrrin complexes of P-block elements.Journal of coordination chemistry · 2025
    Article
  3. Visible light promotes PACS catalysis · 2025
    Article
  4. Electrophilic C(spAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Chemoselective Primary Amination of Aryl Boronic Acids by PJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gen LiDepartment of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6857-0235
Trevor V NykazaDepartment of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7683-2984
Julian C CooperDepartment of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8231-2654
Antonio RamirezChemical and Synthetic Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, One Squibb Drive, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2636-6855
Michael R LuzungChemical and Synthetic Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, One Squibb Drive, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9729-2211
Alexander T RadosevichDepartment of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5373-7343

Funding

Synthetic Methods based on Biphilic Phosphorus CatalystsR01GM114547 · NIGMS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI Alexander T Radosevich · 2015 to 2026
$4.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM114547
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experimental, spectroscopic, and computational studies are reported that provide an evidence-based mechanistic description of an intermolecular reductive C-N coupling of nitroarenes and arylboronic acids catalyzed by a redox-active main-group catalyst (1,2,2,3,4,4-hexamethylphosphetane

Identifiers

PMID32178514
PMCPMC7146866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.