Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32178383›Full record

ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Is the Application of Plant Probiotic Bacterial Consortia Always Beneficial for Plants? Exploring Synergies between Rhizobial and Non-Rhizobial Bacteria and Their Effects on Agro-Economically Valuable Crops.

Esther Menéndez, Ana Paço

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Use of beneficial microorganisms in bean cultivation: strategies employed to increase productivity.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Perspective on utilization ofAIMS microbiology · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Unraveling Nitrogen Fixing Potential of Endophytic Diazotrophs of DifferentInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Bioremediation byMicroorganisms · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Esther MenéndezMED-Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development, Institute for Advanced Studies and Research (IIFA), University of Évora, Pólo da Mitra, Ap. 94, 7006-554 Évora, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-2320-0067
Ana PaçoMED-Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development, Institute for Advanced Studies and Research (IIFA), University of Évora, Pólo da Mitra, Ap. 94, 7006-554 Évora, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-0362-1630
University of Évora · PT

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia PTDC/AGR-PRO/2978/2014 and UIDB/05183/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The overgrowth of human population and the demand for high-quality foods necessitate the search for sustainable alternatives to increase crop production. The use of biofertilizers, mostly based on plant probiotic bacteria (PPB), represents a reliable and eco-friendly solution. This heterogeneous group of bacteria possesses many features with positive effects on plants; however, how these bacteria with each other and with the environment when released into a field has still barely been studied. In this review, we focused on the diversity of root endophytic rhizobial and non-rhizobial bacteria existing within plant root tissues, and also on their potential applications as consortia exerting benefits for plants and the environment. We demonstrated the benefits of using bacterial inoculant consortia instead of single-strain inoculants. We then critically discussed several considerations that farmers, companies, governments, and the scientific community should take into account when a biofertilizer based on those PPBs is proposed, including (i) a proper taxonomic identification, (ii) the characterization of the beneficial features of PPB strains, and (iii) the ecological impacts on plants, environment, and plant/soil microbiomes. Overall, the success of a PPB consortium depends on many factors that must be considered and analyzed before its application as a biofertilizer in an agricultural system.

Indexed as

consortiumendophytesfield trialsplant growth promotionplant probioticssustainable agriculture

Identifiers

PMID32178383
PMCPMC7151578
OpenAlexW3012097468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.