Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32176777›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2020

Network localization of clinical, cognitive, and neuropsychiatric symptoms in Alzheimer's disease.

Aaron M Tetreault, Tony Phan, Dana Orlando, Ilwoo Lyu, Hakmook Kang, Bennett Landman, R Ryan Darby, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Heterogeneous neuroimaging findings in obsessive-compulsive disorder converge to a common brain network using coordinate network mapping.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Robust lesion network mapping reveals genuine symptom-specific networks.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aaron M TetreaultDepartment of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Tony PhanDepartment of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Dana OrlandoDepartment of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Ilwoo LyuDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Hakmook KangDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Bennett LandmanDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
R Ryan DarbyDepartment of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is both clinical and neuroanatomical variability at the single-subject level in Alzheimer's disease, complicating our understanding of brain-behaviour relationships and making it challenging to develop neuroimaging biomarkers to track disease severity, progression, and response to treatment. Prior work has shown that both group-level atrophy in clinical dementia syndromes and complex neurological symptoms in patients with focal brain lesions localize to brain networks. Here, we use a new technique termed 'atrophy network mapping' to test the hypothesis that single-subject atrophy maps in patients with a clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease will also localize to syndrome-specific and symptom-specific brain networks. First, we defined single-subject atrophy maps by comparing cortical thickness in each Alzheimer's disease patient versus a group of age-matched, cognitively normal subjects across two independent datasets (total Alzheimer's disease patients = 330). No more than 42% of Alzheimer's disease patients had atrophy at any given location across these datasets. Next, we determined the network of brain regions functionally connected to each Alzheimer's disease patient's location of atrophy using seed-based functional connectivity in a large (n = 1000) normative connectome. Despite the heterogeneity of atrophied regions at the single-subject level, we found that 100% of patients with a clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease had atrophy functionally connected to the same brain regions in the mesial temporal lobe, precuneus cortex, and angular gyrus. Results were specific versus control subjects and replicated across two independent datasets. Finally, we used atrophy network mapping to define symptom-specific networks for impaired memory and delusions, finding that our results matched symptom networks derived from patients with focal brain lesions. Our study supports atrophy network mapping as a method to localize clinical, cognitive, and neuropsychiatric symptoms to brain networks, providing insight into brain-behaviour relationships in patients with dementia.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAlzheimer DiseaseAtrophyBrainConnectomeFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleAlzheimer’s diseasebrain atrophydelusionfunctional connectivitymemory

Identifiers

PMID32176777
PMCPMC7174048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.