Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32176717›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

The geometry of reaction norms yields insights on classical fitness functions for Great Lakes salmon.

James E Breck, Carl P Simon, Edward S Rutherford, Bobbi S Low, P J Lamberson, Mark W Rogers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

James E BreckSchool for Environment and Sustainability, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5358-1580
Carl P SimonCenter for the Study of Complex Systems, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Edward S RutherfordNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Bobbi S LowSchool for Environment and Sustainability, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
P J LambersonDepartment of Communication, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4176-9428
Mark W RogersU.S. Geological Survey, Tennessee Cooperative Fishery Research Unit, Tennessee Technological University, Cookeville, Tennessee, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Life history theory examines how characteristics of organisms, such as age and size at maturity, may vary through natural selection as evolutionary responses that optimize fitness. Here we ask how predictions of age and size at maturity differ for the three classical fitness functions-intrinsic rate of natural increase r, net reproductive rate R0, and reproductive value Vx-for semelparous species. We show that different choices of fitness functions can lead to very different predictions of species behavior. In one's efforts to understand an organism's behavior and to develop effective conservation and management policies, the choice of fitness function matters. The central ingredient of our approach is the maturation reaction norm (MRN), which describes how optimal age and size at maturation vary with growth rate or mortality rate. We develop a practical geometric construction of MRNs that allows us to include different growth functions (linear growth and nonlinear von Bertalanffy growth in length) and develop two-dimensional MRNs useful for quantifying growth-mortality trade-offs. We relate our approach to Beverton-Holt life history invariants and to the Stearns-Koella categorization of MRNs. We conclude with a detailed discussion of life history parameters for Great Lakes Chinook Salmon and demonstrate that age and size at maturity are consistent with predictions using R0 (but not r or Vx) as the underlying fitness function.

Indexed as

Genetic FitnessAnimalsBiological EvolutionBody SizeConservation of Natural ResourcesFemaleLakesMaleModels, BiologicalSalmonSelection, GeneticSexual Maturation

Identifiers

PMID32176717
PMCPMC7075576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.