Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32176712›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Engineering Cercospora disease resistance via expression of Cercospora nicotianae cercosporin-resistance genes and silencing of cercosporin production in tobacco.

Elizabeth Thomas, Sonia Herrero, Hayde Eng, Nafisa Gomaa, Jeff Gillikin, Roslyn Noar, Aydin Beseli, Margaret E Daub

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Functional Outlook ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Elizabeth ThomasDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8471-2608
Sonia HerreroDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States of America.
Hayde EngDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States of America.
Nafisa GomaaDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States of America.
Jeff GillikinDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States of America.
Roslyn NoarDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States of America.
Aydin BeseliDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States of America.
Margaret E DaubDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4292-3949
North Carolina State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fungi in the genus Cercospora cause crop losses world-wide on many crop species. The wide host range and success of these pathogens has been attributed to the production of a photoactivated toxin, cercosporin. We engineered tobacco for resistance to Cercospora nicotianae utilizing two strategies: 1) transformation with cercosporin autoresistance genes isolated from the fungus, and 2) transformation with constructs to silence the production of cercosporin during disease development. Three C. nicotianae cercosporin autoresistance genes were tested: ATR1 and CFP, encoding an ABC and an MFS transporter, respectively, and 71cR, which encodes a hypothetical protein. Resistance to the pathogen was identified in transgenic lines expressing ATR1 and 71cR, but not in lines transformed with CFP. Silencing of the CTB1 polyketide synthase and to a lesser extent the CTB8 pathway regulator in the cercosporin biosynthetic pathway also led to the recovery of resistant lines. All lines tested expressed the transgenes, and a direct correlation between the level of transgene expression and disease resistance was not identified in any line. Resistance was also not correlated with the degree of silencing in the CTB1 and CTB8 silenced lines. We conclude that expression of fungal cercosporin autoresistance genes as well as silencing of the cercosporin pathway are both effective strategies for engineering resistance to Cercospora diseases where cercosporin plays a critical role.

Indexed as

Genes, FungalGene SilencingGenetic EngineeringAscomycotaDisease ResistanceDrug Resistance, FungalGene Expression Regulation, FungalNicotianaPerylenePlants, Genetically ModifiedTransformation, GeneticTransgenescercosporinPerylene

Identifiers

PMID32176712
PMCPMC7075572
OpenAlexW3010902893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.