Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32176645›Full record

ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2020

Plasma Amyloid Concentration in Alzheimer's Disease: Performance of a High-Throughput Amyloid Assay in Distinguishing Alzheimer's Disease Cases from Controls.

Insa Feinkohl, Carola G Schipke, Jochen Kruppa, Felix Menne, Georg Winterer, Tobias Pischon, Oliver Peters

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Heritability of Alzheimer's disease plasma biomarkers: A nuclear twin family design.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Plasma biomarkers for Alzheimer's and related dementias: A review and outlook for clinical neuropsychology.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Insa FeinkohlMax-Delbrueck-Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Berlin, Germany.
Carola G SchipkeBerlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.
Jochen KruppaBerlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.
Felix MenneBerlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.
Georg WintererBerlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.
Tobias PischonMax-Delbrueck-Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Berlin, Germany.
Oliver PetersBerlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEMax Delbrück Center · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCollection of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for measurement of amyloid-β (Aβ) species is a gold standard in Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnosis, but has risks. Thus, establishing a low-risk blood Aβ test with high AD sensitivity and specificity is of outmost interest.

objectiveWe evaluated the ability of a commercially available plasma Aβ assay to distinguish AD patients from biomarker-healthy controls.

methodIn a case-control design, we examined plasma samples from 44 AD patients (A + N+) and 49 controls (A-N-) from a memory clinic. AD was diagnosed using a combination of neuropsychological examination, CSF biomarker analysis and brain imaging. Total Aβ40 and total Aβ42 in plasma were measured through enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technology using ABtest40 and ABtest42 test kits (Araclon Biotech Ltd.). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses with outcome AD were performed, and sensitivity and specificity were calculated.

resultsPlasma Aβ42/40 was weakly positively correlated with CSF Aβ42/40 (Spearman's rho 0.22; p = 0.037). Plasma Aβ42/40 alone was not able to statistically significantly distinguish between AD patients and controls (AUC 0.58; 95% CI 0.46, 0.70). At a cut-point of 0.076 maximizing sensitivity and specificity, plasma Aβ42/40 had a sensitivity of 61.2% and a specificity of 63.6%.

conclusionIn this sample, the high-throughput blood Aβ assay was not able to distinguish well between AD patients and controls. Whether or not the assay may be useful in large-scale epidemiological settings remains to be seen.

Indexed as

AgedAlzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesBiomarkersBrainCase-Control StudiesEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansMaleMental Status and Dementia TestsNeuroimagingPeptide FragmentsSensitivity and SpecificityAmyloid beta-Peptidesamyloid beta-protein (1-42)BiomarkersPeptide FragmentsAlzheimer’s diseaseamyloiddiagnosishigh-throughput assayplasma

Identifiers

PMID32176645
PMCPMC7242850
OpenAlexW3012282163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.