Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32176464›Full record

ArticleCurrent protocols in human genetics2020

Clinical Interpretation of Sequence Variants.

Junyu Zhang, Yanyi Yao, Haixian He, Jun Shen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current protocols in human genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
12.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A standardized approach to test missenseJID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Computational Evidence for Digenic Contribution ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Molecular Screening Reveals De Novo Loss-of-FunctionInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Non-syndromic OTX2-associated pattern dystrophy: a 10-year multimodal imaging study.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Junyu ZhangDepartment of Reproductive Genetics, International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yanyi YaoDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Haixian HeDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jun ShenDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · USInternational Peace Maternity & Child Health Hospital · CNShandong University · CN

Funding

TRAINING GRANT IN GENETICST32GM007748 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI Anne O'Donnell-Luria, Louise Wilkins-Haug · 1985 to 2026
$12.0M
SEQuencing a Baby for an Optimal Outcome (SEQaBOO)R01DC015052 · NIDCD · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI MORTON, CYNTHIA CASSON · 2016 to 2020
$3.8M
Clinical Molecular Genetic Diagnosis of Hearing LossR03DC013866 · NIDCD · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SHEN, JUN · 2014 to 2016
$601k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015052NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC013866NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical interpretation of DNA sequence variants is a critical step in reporting clinical genetic testing results. Application of next-generation sequencing technology in molecular genetic testing has facilitated diagnoses of genetic disorders in clinical practice. However, the large number of DNA sequence variants detected in clinical specimens, many of which have never been seen before, make clinical interpretation challenging. Recommendations by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) have been widely adopted by clinical laboratories around the world to guide clinical interpretation of sequence variants. The ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation Working Group and various disease-specific variant curation expert panels have also developed specifications for the ACMG/AMP recommendations. Despite these efforts to standardize variant interpretation in clinical practice, different laboratories may subjectively use professional judgment to determine which criteria are applicable when classifying a variant. In addition, clinicians and researchers who are not familiar with the variant interpretation process may have difficulty understanding clinical genetic reports and communicating the clinical significance of genetic testing results. Here we provide a step-by-step protocol for clinical interpretation of sequence variants, including practical examples. By following this protocol, clinical laboratory geneticists can interpret the clinical significance of sequence variants according to the ACMG/AMP recommendations and ClinGen framework. Furthermore, this article will help clinicians and researchers to understand variant classification in clinical genetic testing reports and evaluate the quality of the reports. © 2020 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Basic Protocol: Interpreting the clinical significance of sequence variants Support Protocol: Reevaluating the clinical significance of sequence variants.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationGenome, HumanSoftwareGenetic TestingGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansInformation DisseminationSequence Analysis, DNAACMG/AMP recommendationsClinGenclinical genetic testingsequence variant interpretationvariant reevaluation

Identifiers

PMID32176464
PMCPMC7431429
OpenAlexW3010989748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.