Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32176426›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental science2020

Visual experiences during letter production contribute to the development of the neural systems supporting letter perception.

Sophia Vinci-Booher, Karin H James

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sophia Vinci-BooherDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Karin H JamesDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Indiana University Bloomington · US

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN INTEGRATIVE DEVELOPMENTAL PROCESST32HD007475 · NICHD · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI LINDA B. SMITH · 1995 to 2026
$9.5M
Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteIndiana University Bloomington Imaging Research Facility Brain Scan Credit ProgramIndiana University Emerging Areas of ResearchIndiana University Office of the Vice President for Research Emerging Area of Research Initiative, Learning: Brains, Machines, and ChildrenJohnson Center for Innovation and Translational Research at Indiana University through their Translational Research Pilot Grant programNational Institute of Health HD 007475-21NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007475
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Letter production through handwriting creates visual experiences that may be important for the development of visual letter perception. We sought to better understand the neural responses to different visual percepts created during handwriting at different levels of experience. Three groups of participants, younger children, older children, and adults, ranging in age from 4.5 to 22 years old, were presented with dynamic and static presentations of their own handwritten letters, static presentations of an age-matched control's handwritten letters, and typeface letters during fMRI. First, data from each group were analyzed through a series of contrasts designed to highlight neural systems that were most sensitive to each visual experience in each age group. We found that younger children recruited ventral-temporal cortex during perception and this response was associated with the variability present in handwritten forms. Older children and adults also recruited ventral-temporal cortex; this response, however, was significant for typed letter forms but not variability. The adult response to typed letters was more distributed than in the children, including ventral-temporal, parietal, and frontal motor cortices. The adult response was also significant for one's own handwritten letters in left parietal cortex. Second, we compared responses among age groups. Compared to older children, younger children demonstrated a greater fusiform response associated with handwritten form variability. When compared to adults, younger children demonstrated a greater response to this variability in left parietal cortex. Our results suggest that the visual perception of the variability present in handwritten forms that occurs during handwriting may contribute to developmental changes in the neural systems that support letter perception.

Indexed as

HandwritingAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFrontal LobeHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleParietal LobePattern Recognition, VisualTemporal LobeVisual PerceptionYoung AdultdevelopmentfMRIhandwritingletter perceptionletter productionliteracy

Identifiers

PMID32176426
PMCPMC7901804
OpenAlexW3012537660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.