ArticleJAMA pediatrics2020
Association Between Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and Risk of Fracture in Children.
Article in JAMA pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.
- Use of acid-suppressive drugs and risk of fracture in children and young adults: a meta-analysis of observational studies.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- Proton-Pump Inhibitors and Fat Absorption in Cystic Fibrosis and Pancreatic Insufficiency: A Randomized Crossover Pilot Trial.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2025Trial
- Prenatal Opioid Exposure and Subsequent Risk of Fractures in Children: An Emulated Target Trial Using a Nationwide Birth Cohort.Indian pediatrics · 2026Article
- Use of proton pump inhibitors in children in a tertiary hospital in Belgium.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Prenatal and/or childhood acid-suppressive medication use and risk of serious infections in children: A retrospective analysis of Taiwanese medical claims data.BMC medicine · 2026Article
- Medical and surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux in the neonate.Seminars in perinatology · 2026Review
- Article
- Drug Safety Signals for Pediatric Osteopenia and Osteoporosis: A Disproportionality Analysis of USFDA Adverse Event Reporting System.Current pediatric reviews · 2026Article
- Medication-Related Impacts on Pediatric Bone Health.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2025Review
- Ten-Year Trends in Pharmacologic Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Pediatric Feeding Disorders in Young Children.The Journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- Real-World Safety Profile of Proton Pump Inhibitors in Infants as Reported in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS): Tiny Tummies, Key Decisions.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Review
- Why think twice before prescribing proton pump inhibitors.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Review
- The evolution of nutrition management in children with severe neurological impairment with a focus on cerebral palsy.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025Review
- The evolution of nutritional care in children with food allergies - With a focus on cow's milk allergy.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025Review
- Prescription drug use in Danish children and adolescents 2005-2023.European journal of epidemiology · 2025Article
- Prescriptions of anti-reflux drugs in neonatology and neonatal intensive care units: A large multicentre observational study (2014-2022).British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2024Observational
- Evaluation of Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Pediatric General Medicine Patients After Transfer From the Intensive Care Unit and at Discharge.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2024Article
- Proton Pump Inhibitors and Risk of COVID-19 Infection in Children.The Journal of pediatrics · 2024Article
- Proton Pump Inhibitors in Pediatric Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use has been linked to increased risk of fracture in adults. Despite a trend in prescription of PPIs in children, there is scarce evidence regarding this safety concern in pediatric patients. Objective: To evaluate the association between PPI use and risk of fracture in children. Design: This nationwide register-based cohort study included data from Sweden from July 2006 to December 2016. Children younger than 18 years who initiated PPI use were matched on propensity score and age with those who did not initiate PPI use. Exposure: Initiation of PPI use. Main Outcomes and Measures: Cox regression was adopted to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for a first fracture of any type and 5 subtypes of fracture, with follow-up for up to 5 years. To address potential residual confounding, high-dimensional propensity score matching and a direct comparison with histamine-2 receptor antagonists were performed. Results: There were a total of 115 933 pairs of children included. During a mean (SD) of 2.2 (1.6) years of follow-up, 5354 and 4568 cases of any fracture occurred among those who initiated PPIs vs those who did not, respectively (20.2 vs 18.3 events per 1000 person-years; hazard ratio [HR], 1.11 [95% CI, 1.06-1.15]). Use of PPIs was associated with increased risk of upper-limb fracture (HR, 1.08 [95% CI, 1.03-1.13]), lower-limb fracture (HR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.10-1.29]), and other fractures (HR, 1.51 [95% CI, 1.16-1.97]) but not head fracture (HR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.76-1.13]) or spine fracture (HR, 1.31 [95% CI, 0.95-1.81]). The HRs for fracture according to cumulative duration of PPI use were 1.08 (95% CI, 1.03-1.13) for 30 days or less, 1.14 (95% CI, 1.09-1.20) for 31 to 364 days, and 1.34 (95% CI, 1.13-1.58) for 365 days or more. The association was consistent in most sensitivity analyses, including high-dimensional propensity score matching (HR, 1.10 [95% CI, 1.06-1.15]), although the analysis of PPI vs histamine-2 receptor antagonist did not reach statistical significance (HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.97-1.15]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this large pediatric cohort, PPI use was associated with a small but significant increased risk of any fracture. Risk of fracture should be taken into account when weighing the benefits and risks of PPI treatment in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.