Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32176124›Full record

Trial reportOtology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology2020

Prospective Multicentric Follow-up Study of Cochlear Implantation in Adults With Single-Sided Deafness: Tinnitus and Audiological Outcomes.

Christine Poncet-Wallet, Elisabeth Mamelle, Benoit Godey, Eric Truy, Nicolas Guevara, Marine Ardoint, Dan Gnansia, Michel Hoen, Sonia Saaï, Isabelle Mosnier and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Tinnitus suppression by means of cochlear implantation: does it affect cognition?European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  7. Objective and subjective efficacy of hearing aids in patients with mild-to-moderate unilateral hearing loss: a prospective study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Early effects of very early cochlear implant activation on tinnitus.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Effectiveness of tinnitus therapy using a mobile application.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Animal Models of Tinnitus Treatment: Cochlear and Brain Stimulation.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Christine Poncet-WalletAPHP, Rotschild Hospital, Otolaryngology, Otology and Auditory Implants Department, Paris.
Elisabeth MamelleAPHP, Rotschild Hospital, Otolaryngology, Otology and Auditory Implants Department, Paris.
Benoit GodeyRennes Pontchaillou University Hospital, Otorhinolaryngology Department, Rennes.
Eric TruyEdouard Herriot University Hospital, Otorhinolaryngology, Phoniatry and Head and Neck Surgery Department, Lyon.
Nicolas GuevaraCôte d'Azur University, Nice University Hospital, University Institute of the Face and Neck, Nice, France.
Marine ArdointOticon Medical, Clinical and Scientific Research Group Cochlear Implants, Vallauris.
Dan GnansiaOticon Medical, Clinical and Scientific Research Group Cochlear Implants, Vallauris.
Michel HoenOticon Medical, Clinical and Scientific Research Group Cochlear Implants, Vallauris.
Sonia SaaïOticon Medical, Clinical and Scientific Research Group Cochlear Implants, Vallauris.
Isabelle MosnierAPHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Department of Otology, Auditory Implants and Skull Base Surgery, Ile-de-France Reference Center of Cochlear Implant and Auditory Brainstem Implant, Paris.
Emmanuel LescanneTours Bretonneau University Hospital, Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery Department, Tours.
David BakhosTours Bretonneau University Hospital, Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery Department, Tours.
Christophe VincentUniversity Regional Hospital Roger Salengro, Otology and Oto-neurology Department, Lille, France.
Oticon Medical (Denmark) · DKBretonneau Hospital · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours · FRCochlear (Australia) · AUHôpital Edouard Herriot · FRHôpital Pontchaillou · FRHôpital Roger Salengro · FRInstitut de Chimie de Nice · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study investigated the audiological and tinnitus outcomes of cochlear implantation (CI) in adults with single-sided deafness (SSD) and tinnitus. STUDY

designMulticentered prospective, non-randomized intervention study.

settingSix French CI centers. PATIENTS: Twenty-six patients with SSD and incapacitating tinnitus (Tinnitus Handicap Inventory [THI] >58) underwent cochlear implantation.

interventionsFirst, CIs delivered only masking white noise stimulation for 1 month and then standard CI stimulation.

main outcome measuresBefore and after CI surgery, patients completed the THI, Tinnitus Reaction Questionnaire (TRQ), Subjective Tinnitus Severity Scale (STSS), and two visual analogue scales quantifying tinnitus loudness and annoyance. Speech perception in spatialized noise was tested at 13 months.

resultsThe first month of white noise stimulation triggered a significant improvement in THI scores (72 ± 9 to 55 ± 20, p < 0.05). No change was observed for the other measures. After 1 year of standard CI stimulation, 23 patients (92%) reported a significant improvement in tinnitus. This improvement started 1 to 2 months after CI and exceeded 40% improvement for 14 patients (54%). Average speech-in-noise perception after 1 year significantly improved for the 23 patients who completed these measures.

conclusionsCI is efficacious to reduce the handicap of patient with SSD and incapacitating tinnitus, leading to a decrease in reported tinnitus and partial restoration of binaural hearing abilities.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsDeafnessHearing Loss, UnilateralSpeech PerceptionTinnitusAdultFollow-Up StudiesHumansProspective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID32176124
PMCPMC7208276
OpenAlexW2998614770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.