Observational studyMedicine2020
Early recurrence detected by 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Observational study in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Parametric mapping of dynamicCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026Article
- Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: The Dawn of the Era of Nuclear Medicine?International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Predicting early recurrence for resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study in China.American journal of cancer research · 2021Article
- Overlooked risk for needle tract seeding following endoscopic ultrasound-guided minimally invasive tissue acquisition.World journal of gastroenterology · 2020Review
- Prognostic Implications of 18-FDG Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Resectable Pancreatic Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography integrated with computed tomography (F-FDG PET/CT) has been proved to be practical in detecting occult malignant lesions. However, the evidence of its utility in detecting early recurrence after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is lacking. Therefore, the primary aim of the present study is to evaluate the diagnostic value of F-FDG PET/CT in the early postoperative period after radical resection of PDAC.This retrospective study included 32 patients who had F-FDG PET/CT scan within 6 months after radical resection of PDAC between January 2010 and December 2018.In total, 10 positive PET results were found at surgical margins of remnant pancreas, 12 at locoregional lymph nodes, 5 at distant areas, with the corresponding mean maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) of 5.8 ± 1.1, 5.9 ± 0.9, and 6.4 ± 0.7, respectively. The median follow-up time was 23.5 months (range: 8-75 months), and the median survival time was 39.5 months (95% confidence interval: 14.6-64.4 months) for the entire cohort. Patients with positive PET findings at either locoregional lymph nodes or distant areas obtained significantly poorer overall survival (OS) than those without increased FDG uptake at the corresponding areas (P = .003 and P < .001, respectively). Whereas comparisons of OS between patients with or without increased FDG uptake at the surgical margin of remnant pancreas presented no statistically difference (P = .742).The early application of F-FDG PET/CT after radical resection of PDAC could stratify the prognosis of patients well by detecting occult early recurrence at locoregional lymph nodes and distant areas efficiently.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.