ArticleMedicine2020
Study on the risk prediction for cerebral infarction after transient ischemic attack: A STROBE compliant study.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk of Ischemic Stroke After Transient Ischemic Attack in Patients Receiving Comprehensive Versus Noncomprehensive Diagnostic Workup: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Pooled it
- Predictive value of magnetic resonance angiography combined with serum ischemia-modified albumin for secondary cerebral infarction after transient ischemic attack.Thrombosis journal · 2025Article
- Synthetic role of miR-200b-3p, ABCDBrain and behavior · 2022Article
- miR-129-5p Ameliorates Ischemic Brain Injury by Binding to SIAH1 and Activating the mTOR Signaling Pathway.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transient ischemic attack (TIA) is often recurrent, and about one-third of patients will progress to cerebral infarction. Rapidly identifying high-risk patients is pivotal to prevent the development of cerebral infarction. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the value of ABCD score, ABCD score combined with magnetic resonance diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and intracranial arterial magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in predicting cerebral infarction after 2 to 30 days of transient ischemic attack (TIA).182 patients with TIA from August 2011 to August 2014 were enrolled as study subjects, and their clinical data, test results of DWI and MRA were collected. The incidence of cerebral infarction was observed at 2 days, 7 days and 30 days after TIA in patients with TIA, through scoring according to the 7-point ABCD score method proposed by Johnston. The relationship between ABCD score, performances of DWI and MRA and the early incidence of cerebral infarction after TIA was analyzed. The accuracy rating of ABCD score and ABCD + DWI + MRA score used for predicting the early incidence of cerebral infarction after TIA were compared with each other.The incidence of cerebral infarction after TIA was 19 cases (10.4%) in 2 days, 42 cases (23.1%) in 7 days, 56 cases (30.8%) in 30 days respectively. For the ABCD score of incidence of cerebral infarction 2 to 30 days after TIA, that of those with high risk was higher than that with medium risk, and that with the medium risk was higher than that with low risk (P < .05). The area under the curve of ABCD + DWI + MRA score and ABCD score predicting the incidence of cerebral infarction was: in 2 days: 0.782 and 0.748, in 7 days: 0.839 and 0.801, in 30 days: 0.780 and 0.757, P < .05.Compared with ABCD score, ABCD score combined with DWI and MRA can further improve the accuracy of prediction for cerebral infarction after TIA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.