ArticleMedicine2020
Clinical profile and treatment outcome of collision carcinoma in cervix.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- A case of coexistent poorly differentiated adenosquamous carcinoma (glassy cell carcinoma), usual-type adenocarcinoma, and squamous cell carcinoma in situ of the cervix.Medical molecular morphology · 2023Article
- De Novo Glioblastoma Masqueraded within a Hemispheric Dural Meningiomatosis: Rare Imaging Findings and Rationale for Two-Staged Resection.Journal of neurological surgery reports · 2022Article
- [Epidemiological and clinical features of cervical cancer in Cameroon: experience in the Douala General Hospital].The Pan African medical journal · 2022Article
- Collision carcinoma of the rectum involving neuroendocrine carcinoma and adenocarcinoma: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A collision tumor is defined by co-existence of two adjacent tumors which are histologically distinct. Little is known about the clinical manifestation, treatment, and prognosis of cervical collision cancer. The objective of the study was to investigate the management and prognosis of patients with cervical collision cancer.We retrospectively reviewed and enrolled patients with cervical collision carcinoma from 2010 to 2018 in two institutions (West China Hospital and West China Second University Hospital). The clinical presentation, pathology, treatment, and prognosis of patients with collision carcinoma of the uterine cervix were retrospectively reviewed. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.A total of 24 patients were included in this study. The proportion of cervical collision carcinoma was 0.4% in the cervical carcinoma cohort (24/6015). The median age of the patients with cervical collision cancer was 42 years. The most common presenting symptom was cervical contactive bleeding. There were 23 patients classified as International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IA1-IIB. All patients except one received radical hysterectomy, in which 21 patients received bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) and pelvic lymphadenectomy in addition. There were 16 patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. The median follow-up time was 21 months. No patient death was observed. Recurrence only occurred in two patients. The 5-year OS rates and PFS rates were 100% and 91.7%, respectively.This study revealed that cervical collision cancer was a type of rare cervical cancer with good prognosis. Cervical collision cancer responded well to the same treatment methods as the cervical squamous cell carcinoma and was associated with few recurrence and long survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.