ArticleMedicine2020
Effectiveness of tumescent solution combined with negative pressure wound therapy in traditional high ligation and stripping of the great saphenous vein.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nursing Care Strategies for Varicose Veins: A Narrative Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Review
- Study of Subfascial Endoscopic Perforator Surgery Combined with Endovenous Laser Treatment in the Treatment of Great Saphenous Varicose Veins.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional high ligation and stripping (THLS) is a routine operation for varicose veins. However, THLS is accompanied with postoperative subcutaneous ecchymosis and pain. In this current study, we aimed to explore the effect of tumescence solution (TS) combined with negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) on the relief of subcutaneous ecchymosis and pain after THLS of great saphenous vein.A total of 180 patients receiving THLS were enrolled in group A, and 120 patients undergoing THLS and TS combined with NPWT were assigned into group B. The occurrences of subcutaneous ecchymosis and pain were recorded. Moreover, the total area of subcutaneous ecchymosis was estimated by the grid method. Visual analogue scale (VAS) score was used to assess the pain level of both groups.Preoperative characteristics were not significantly different between 2 groups. Postoperative ecchymosis occurred in 112 cases (62.2%) of group A and 41 cases (34.2%) of group B. The area of ecchymosis in group A (66.6 ± 44.5) cm was larger than that in group B (25.2 ± 19.9) cm. The number of patients without obvious pain in group A (57, 31.7%) was significantly less than that in group B (77, 64.2%) after operation. In addition, VAS score in group A (3.1 ± 2.6) was higher than that in group B (2.2 ± 1.9).In conclusion, the application of TS combined with NPWT in THLS can not only alleviate subcutaneous ecchymosis and pain, but also prevent the occurrence of subcutaneous ecchymosis and pain after operation. Therefore, it is conducive to postoperative recovery and is suitable for clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.