Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32175970›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient safety2020

Preparing for an Influenza Pandemic: Hospital Acceptance Study of Filtering Facepiece Respirator Decontamination Using Ultraviolet Germicidal Irradiation.

Christopher Nemeth, Dawn Laufersweiler, Emily Polander, Christianna Orvis, Del Harnish, Sherwin E Morgan, Michael O'Connor, Saul Hymes, Sharon Nachman, Brian Heimbuch

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient safety, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Analysis of Taiwan's Mask Collection and Plan Evasion during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. A Review of Decontamination Methods for Filtering Facepiece Respirators.Journal of the International Society for Respiratory Protection · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher NemethFrom the Capital Area Division, Applied Research Associates, Inc, Alexandria, Virginia.
Dawn LaufersweilerFrom the Capital Area Division, Applied Research Associates, Inc, Alexandria, Virginia.
Emily PolanderFrom the Capital Area Division, Applied Research Associates, Inc, Alexandria, Virginia.
Christianna OrvisGulf Coast Regional Medical Center.
Del HarnishEngineering Science Division, Applied Research Associates, Inc, Panama City, Florida.
Sherwin E MorganDepartment of Respiratory Care Services, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Michael O'ConnorUniversity of Chicago Medical Center, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Saul HymesStony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, New York.
Sharon NachmanStony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, New York.
Brian HeimbuchEngineering Science Division, Applied Research Associates, Inc, Panama City, Florida.
Applied Research Associates (United States) · USStony Brook University Hospital · USUniversity of Chicago Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPredictions estimate supplies of filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) would be limited in the event of a severe influenza pandemic. Ultraviolet decontamination and reuse (UVDR) is a potential approach to mitigate an FFR shortage. A field study sought to understand healthcare workers' perspectives and potential logistics issues related to implementation of UVDR methods for FFRs in hospitals.

methodsData were collected at three hospitals using a structured guide to conduct 19 individual interviews, 103 focus group interviews, and 285 individual surveys. Data were then evaluated using thematic analysis to reveal key themes.

resultsData revealed noteworthy variation in FFR use across the sample, along with preferences and requirements for the use of UVDR, unit design, and FFR reuse. Based on a scale of 1 (low) to 10 (high), the mean perception of safety in a high mortality pandemic wearing no FFR was 1.25 of 10, wearing an FFR for an extended period without decontamination was 4.20 of 10, and using UVDR was 7.72 of 10.

conclusionsIn addition to technical design and development, preparation and training will be essential to successful implementation of a UVDR program. Ultraviolet decontamination and reuse program design and implementation must account for actual clinical practice, compliance with regulations, and practical financial considerations to be successfully adopted so that it can mitigate potential FFR shortages in a pandemic.

Indexed as

DecontaminationHospitalsHumansInfluenza, HumanPandemicsSurveys and QuestionnairesUltraviolet TherapyVentilators, Mechanical

Identifiers

PMID32175970
PMCPMC7224602
OpenAlexW3012250368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.