ArticleJMIR medical informatics2020
The Use of Patient-Facing Teleconsultations in the National Health Service: Scoping Review.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Consumers' Willingness to Pay for eHealth and Its Influencing Factors: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Pooled it
- Guidelines of the French Society of Otorhinolaryngology (SFORL) for teleconsultation in patients with vertigo during the COVID-19 pandemic.European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases · 2021Guideline
- Remote Consultations Versus Standard Face-to-Face Appointments for Liver Transplant Patients in Routine Hospital Care: Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial of myVideoClinic.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Trial
- The importance of "being seen": a qualitative interview study of patient and clinician experiences of virtual and face-to-face TIA clinics in one region of England.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Does Digital Make a Difference? Willingness-to-Pay for Digital Versus Offline Weight Loss in Germany.Obesity science & practice · 2026Article
- Patient removals: time to rethink exclusion in general practice?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026Article
- Treatment Adherence and Outcomes in Patients with Tuberculosis Treated with Telemedicine: A Scoping Review.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025Review
- Social and Ethical Aspects of Remote and Hybrid Care in the Special Allocation Scheme in general practice (SEARCH): A mixed methods feasibility study protocol.NIHR open research · 2025Article
- Touching Technology-Parents' Experiences of Remote Consultations for Children With Severe Congenital Cardiac Conditions: Quasi-Experimental Cohort Study.JMIR pediatrics and parenting · 2024Article
- Exploration of primary care models and timely access to care in New Brunswick (Canada).BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Implementation of a Web-Based Outpatient Asynchronous Consultation Service: Mixed Methods Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Defining practices suitable for care via teleconsultation in gynaecological and obstetrical care: a French Delphi survey.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Telehealth Intervention: A Proposal for a Telemedicine Manual to Ascertain the Civil Disability Status in Italy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- The informal way to success or failure? Findings from a comparative case study on video consultation training and implementation in two Danish hospitals.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- [Remote management of musculoskeletal pain : A pragmatic approach to the implementation of video and phone consultations in musculoskeletal practice. German version].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2023Review
- Hand Trauma Virtual Clinics Prove Effective During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Hand (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- [Assessment of the implementation of an care teleregulation project in a Brazilian capital city].Cadernos de saude publica · 2023Article
- Patient centered care in primary health care teleconsultations: an exploratory study.Procedia computer science · 2023Article
- Insights from an Exploratory Retrospective Cohort Study: Are Face-to-Face Follow-Up Consultations after Colonoscopy a Thing of the Past?Digestive diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe National Health Service (NHS) Long-Term Plan has set out a vision of enabling patients to access digital interactions with health care professionals within 5 years, including by video link.
objectiveThis review aimed to examine the extent and nature of the use of patient-facing teleconsultations within a health care setting in the United Kingdom and what outcome measures have been assessed.
methodsWe conducted a systematic scoping review of teleconsultation studies following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature were searched up to the end of December 2018 for publications that reported on the use of patient-facing teleconsultations in a UK health care setting.
resultsThe search retrieved 3132 publications, of which 101 were included for a full review. Overall, the studies were heterogeneous in design, in the specialty assessed, and reported outcome measures. The technology used for teleconsultations changed over time with earlier studies employing bespoke, often expensive, solutions. Two-thirds of the studies, conducted between 1995 and 2005, used this method. Later studies transitioned to Web-based commercial solutions such as Skype. There were five outcome measures that were assessed: (1) technical feasibility, (2) user satisfaction, (3) clinical effectiveness, (4) cost, (5) logistical and operational considerations. Due to the changing nature of technology over time, there were differing technical issues across the studies. Generally, teleconsultations were acceptable to patients, but this was less consistent among health care professionals. However, among both groups, face-to-face consultations were still seen as the gold standard. A wide range of clinical scenarios found teleconsultations to be clinically useful but potentially limited to more straightforward clinical interactions. Due to the wide array of study types and changes in technology over time, it is difficult to draw definitive conclusions on the cost involved. However, cost savings for health care providers have been demonstrated by the goal-directed implementation of teleconsultations. The integration of technology into routine practice represents a complex problem with barriers identified in funding and hospital reimbursement, information technologies infrastructure, and integration into clinicians' workflow.
conclusionsTeleconsultations appear to be safe and effective in the correct clinical situations. Where offered, it is likely that patients will be keen to engage, although teleconsultations should only be offered as an option to support traditional care models rather than replace them outright. Health care staff should be encouraged and supported in using teleconsultations to diversify their practice. Health care organizations need to consider developing a digital technology strategy and implementation groups to assist health care staff to integrate digitally enabled care into routine practice. The introduction of new technologies should be assessed after a set period with service evaluations, including feedback from key stakeholders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.