Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32175881›Full record

ArticleIEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics2020

Automatic Detection of Target Engagement in Transcutaneous Cervical Vagal Nerve Stimulation for Traumatic Stress Triggers.

Nil Z Gurel, Matthew T Wittbrodt, Hewon Jung, Stacy L Ladd, Amit J Shah, Viola Vaccarino, J Douglas Bremner, Omer T Inan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Noninvasive Vagal Nerve Stimulation for Opioid Use Disorder.Annals of depression and anxiety · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nil Z Gurel
Matthew T Wittbrodt
Hewon Jung
Stacy L Ladd
Amit J Shah
Viola Vaccarino
J Douglas Bremner
Omer T Inan

Funding

Dopamine function, inflammation and connectivity in PTSDR01MH120262 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI BREMNER, JAMES DOUGLAS · 2020 to 2023
$2.9M
Biological Correlates of Traumatic StressK24MH076955 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI BREMNER, JAMES DOUGLAS · 2006 to 2013
$946k
Non-Invasive Vagal Nerve Stimulation in Patients with Opioid Use Disorders UG3DA048502 · NIDA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI BREMNER, JAMES DOUGLAS, INAN, OMER TOLGA · 2020 to 2021
$844k
Emotional Stress as a Risk Factor for Arrhythmia: Ischemic and Genetic MechanismsK23HL127251 · NHLBI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI SHAH, AMIT JASVANT · 2016 to 2019
$749k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL127251NIDA NIH HHS UG3 DA048502NIMH NIH HHS K24 MH076955NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH120262RRD VA I01 RX003418
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcutaneous cervical vagal nerve stimulation (tcVNS) devices are attractive alternatives to surgical implants, and can be applied for a number of conditions in ambulatory settings, including stress-related neuropsychiatric disorders. Transferring tcVNS technologies to at-home settings brings challenges associated with the assessment of therapy response. The ability to accurately detect whether tcVNS has been effectively delivered in a remote setting such as the home has never been investigated. We designed and conducted a study in which 12 human subjects received active tcVNS and 14 received sham stimulation in tandem with traumatic stress, and measured continuous cardiopulmonary signals including the electrocardiogram (ECG), photoplethysmogram (PPG), seismocardiogram (SCG), and respiratory effort (RSP). We extracted physiological parameters related to autonomic nervous system activity, and created a feature set from these parameters to: 1) detect active (vs. sham) tcVNS stimulation presence with machine learning methods, and 2) determine which sensing modalities and features provide the most salient markers of tcVNS-based changes in physiological signals. Heart rate (ECG), vasomotor activity (PPG), and pulse arrival time (ECG+PPG) provided sufficient information to determine target engagement (compared to sham) in addition to other combinations of sensors. resulting in 96% accuracy, precision, and recall with a receiver operator characteristics area of 0.96. Two commonly utilized sensing modalities (ECG and PPG) that are suitable for home use can provide useful information on therapy response for tcVNS. The methods presented herein could be deployed in wearable devices to quantify adherence for at-home use of tcVNS technologies.

Indexed as

Signal Processing, Computer-AssistedAdolescentAdultAgedElectrocardiographyHeart RateHumansMachine LearningMiddle AgedMonitoring, AmbulatoryNeckPhotoplethysmographyStress Disorders, TraumaticVagus Nerve StimulationWearable Electronic DevicesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32175881
PMCPMC7393996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.