Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32175799›Full record

ReviewJournal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics2020

The Immunological Basis of Dry Eye Disease and Current Topical Treatment Options.

Laura M Periman, Victor L Perez, Daniel R Saban, Meng C Lin, Piergiorgio Neri

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
12.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 155 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Laura M PerimanPeriman Eye Center, Seattle, Washington.
Victor L PerezDuke Eye Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Daniel R SabanDuke Eye Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Meng C LinSchool of Optometry, Clinical Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, California.
Piergiorgio NeriThe Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Duke University · USNorthwest Eye Surgeons · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

Defining the Immune Cell Roles in Meibomian Gland Dysfunction in the Context of Ocular Surface Immune DiseasesR01EY021798 · NEI · SCHEPENS EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI SABAN, DANIEL RAPHAEL · 2012 to 2025
$5.3M
Immune Mechanisms in Ocular Graft versus Host DiseaseR01EY024484 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI LEVY, ROBERT BENJAMIN, PEREZ, VICTOR L · 2014 to 2025
$5.1M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY024484
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Homeostasis of the lacrimal functional unit is needed to ensure a well-regulated ocular immune response comprising innate and adaptive phases. When the ocular immune system is excessively stimulated and/or immunoregulatory mechanisms are disrupted, the balance between innate and adaptive phases is dysregulated and chronic ocular surface inflammation can result, leading to chronic dry eye disease (DED). According to the Tear Film and Ocular Surface Society Dry Eye Workshop II definition, DED is a multifactorial disorder of the ocular surface characterized by impairment and loss of tear homeostasis (hyperosmolarity), ocular discomfort or pain, and neurosensory abnormalities. Dysregulated ocular immune responses result in ocular surface damage, which is a further contributing factor to DED pathology. Several therapeutics are available to break the vicious circle of DED and prevent chronic disease and progression, including immunosuppressive agents (steroids) and immunomodulators (cyclosporine and lifitegrast). Given the chronic inflammatory nature of DED, each of these agents is commonly used in clinical practice. In this study, we review the immunopathology of DED and the molecular and cellular actions of current topical DED therapeutics to inform clinical decision making.

Indexed as

Administration, TopicalClinical Decision-MakingCyclosporineDry Eye SyndromesGoblet CellsHomeostasisHumansImmunologic FactorsImmunosuppressive AgentsInflammationIntegrinsIntercellular Adhesion Molecule-1Lacrimal ApparatusLymphocyte Function-Associated Antigen-1PhenylalanineSteroidsCyclosporineImmunologic FactorsImmunosuppressive AgentsIntegrinsIntercellular Adhesion Molecule-1lifitegrastLymphocyte Function-Associated Antigen-1PhenylalanineSteroidsSulfonesdry eye diseasegoblet cellsimmune dysregulationimmunologyinflammationintegrin proteinintercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1)lymphocyte function-associated antigen 1 (LFA-1)ocular surfaceT cells

Identifiers

PMID32175799
PMCPMC7175622
OpenAlexW3012365685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.