Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32175754›Full record

ArticlePsychological methods2021

The measurement of the mediator and its influence on statistical mediation conclusions.

Oscar Gonzalez, David P MacKinnon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological methods, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Using causal mediation to examine self-efficacy as a mechanism through which continuing care interventions reduce alcohol use.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2024
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Estimating latent baseline-by-treatment interactions in statistical mediation analysis.Structural equation modeling : a multidisciplinary journal · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Trust in Robots: Challenges and Opportunities.Current robotics reports · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Evaluating Response Shift in Statistical Mediation Analysis.Advances in methods and practices in psychological science
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Oscar GonzalezDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience.ORCID 0000-0001-7122-8799
David P MacKinnonDepartment of Psychology.

Funding

Estimating Mediation Effects in Prevention StudiesR37DA009757 · NIDA · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI MACKINNON, DAVID P · 2015 to 2024
$3.5M
NIDA NIH HHSNIDA NIH HHS R37 DA009757
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In psychology, the causal process between 2 variables can be studied with statistical mediation analysis. To make a causal interpretation about the relation between variables, researchers who use the statistical mediation model make many assumptions about the variables in the model, among which are measurement assumptions about the mediator. For example, researchers often assume that the measure of the mediator yields scores that are reliable and that have a valid interpretation. In this article, we address how several measurement challenges affect the conclusions of statistical mediation analysis, and how researchers can use different psychometric models to study theoretically different causal processes. We use simulated data sets to illustrate how 10 well-fitting and theoretically sound statistical mediation models could significantly detect the indirect effect or miss it entirely depending on how the mediator is represented in the model. In the example, power to detect the indirect effect varied by the amount of true mediator variance that the psychometric model of the mediator was able to isolate. Different strategies to incorporate psychometric methods into mediation research are discussed and future directions are considered. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Data Interpretation, StatisticalModels, StatisticalComputer SimulationFactor Analysis, StatisticalHumansPsychologyPsychometricsReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID32175754
PMCPMC7492484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.